Electrostatic charge build up in environmental electron microscopy

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the mechanisms of electrostatic charge build-up and discharge in environmental electron microscopy (ESEM), particularly in relation to non-conductive samples and the role of humidity and gas ionization. Participants explore how charge accumulation is managed in ESEM compared to traditional scanning electron microscopy (SEM).

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that samples in SEM are grounded to prevent charge build-up and that non-conductive samples are often coated with a conductive layer.
  • There is uncertainty about how charge build-up is suppressed in ESEM, with some suggesting that the presence of humid air may play a role in discharging charges from the sample.
  • One participant proposes that the discharge process might rely on the wetness of the sample to provide a path to ground, while also expressing concerns about the technique's limitations with soluble materials.
  • Another participant mentions that the gas in ESEM is electrically conductive due to ionization from the electron beam, which is suggested as a generally accepted explanation for preventing negative charge accumulation, negating the need for humidity or grounding.
  • Some participants reference external sources, such as Wikipedia and a Nature article, to support their claims about gas ionization in ESEM.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the mechanisms of charge discharge in ESEM, with some supporting the idea of humidity being important, while others argue that gas ionization is sufficient. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the necessity of grounding and the role of humidity.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the discussion regarding the assumptions about the role of humidity and the specific conditions under which ESEM operates. The dependence on definitions of conductivity and the effects of sample composition are also noted but not resolved.

Alex_F
Messages
7
Reaction score
1
TL;DR
Mechanism of discharging electrostatic charge in environmental scanning electron microscopy.
Hello,

If I understand it correctly, the samples are grounded inside a scanning electron microscope (SEM) to avoid charge build up through the electron beam. Also the non-conductive are coated with a conductive layer, so they can be grounded as well.

However, I do not know how the charge build up is suppressed inside an environmental electron microscope (ESEM). I have seen articles in which the have studied surface surface morphology of samples made of insulating material without conductive coating (if I am not mistaken).

Could someone please explain the electrostatic charge build up is avoided in ESEM? Do the samples have to be grounded also in ESEM as with SEM?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Alex_F said:
Summary:: Mechanism of discharging electrostatic charge in environmental scanning electron microscopy.

Could someone please explain the electrostatic charge build up is avoided in ESEM?
Your logic is impeccable. I have no idea of the full answer but I would imagine that it could be to do with the "wet" samples that are mentioned in the Wiki article on ESEM. The system may have limitations?
 
sophiecentaur said:
Your logic is impeccable. I have no idea of the full answer but I would imagine that it could be to do with the "wet" samples that are mentioned in the Wiki article on ESEM. The system may have limitations?
Thanks for your answer. I suppose that it might be the case that the discharge process relies solely on the presence of humid air inside ESEM to wash off and carry the charges away from the sample, but I am not sure.
 
What would the electron beam current be? I saw values less than 1μA mentioned and a 20kV accelerating voltage. Perhaps there is a limit to the time that the scan can be run.
If the sample is wet, the discharge could be through the sample itself, though, to the holder. It's got to involve the wetness. I can't think of any other reason to have it wet than to give a path to ground.
Water could affect samples with soluble bits in them so I guess the technique would have limited application.

You don't half learn a lot on PF! Environmental Electron Microscopes - fantastic.
 
sophiecentaur said:
You don't half learn a lot on PF!
Like the meaning of the term " litote ".
 
Last time I used the word “litotes” was in O Level Latin. But not the last time I used the grammatical form without realizing it explicitly.
 
The explanation of discharging given in section Specimen charging (wikipedia on ESEM) is
Instead of this coating, the gas in the ESEM being electrically conductive prevents negative charge accumulation. The good conductivity of the gas is due to the ionization it undergoes by the incident electron beam and the ionizing SE and BSE signals.
This ionization of the gas is the generally accepted explanation. There is no need for humidity or for the sample being grounded.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: Alex_F, jim mcnamara and sophiecentaur
gentzen said:
The explanation of discharging given in section Specimen charging (wikipedia on ESEM) is

This ionization of the gas is the generally accepted explanation. There is no need for humidity or for the sample being grounded.
That is correct. This is explained very well in this article https://www.nature.com/articles/nmat898.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: gentzen

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K