Electrostatic Potential inside sphere of uniform charge.

jspectral
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
1. Given a sphere of uniform charge Q, radius R: Find an expression for the electrostatic potential V as a function of r for r ≤ R.
Prior proof: E= Q(r)/(4πϵ0)r^2 ,for r≤R where Q(r) is the excess charge in the spherical volume of radius r


2. Relevant equation: V = Q/(4πϵ0)r

3. I tried integrating for spheres of radius ri over 0 - R where ∆Qi is each small bit of charge and ∆Qi = (Q/V)∆Vi giving (3Qr2/R3)∆r.
My eventual answer resulted in (Q/4πϵ0)(R3 - r3)

I know there's some form of integral involved, but I'm not sure what/where.
The answer (shown on the answers) is shown to be V (r) = [Q/(8πϵ0R3)](3R2 - r2) but no working is provided, and I can't for the life of me figure out what they did. Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
lanedance said:

I tried this method:
V(r) - V(R) = \int_{R}^r E.dr where E = \frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_{0}}\frac{Q}{r^2}

But I only end up with factors of \frac{1}{R} and \frac{1}{r}

Am I approaching the problem wrong? Should I be integrating over a different domain?

Considering the answer: V(r) = \frac{Q}{8\pi\epsilon_{0}R^3}(3R^2 - r^2)
I don't get which integral could give the difference in scalar in front of r and R, nor where the bottom factor of R^3 comes from?

I also tried:
\eta = \frac{Q}{V} = \frac{3Q}{4\pi R^3} \Rightarrow \Delta Q_{i} = \frac{3Q}{4\pi R^3}\Delta V_{i} = \frac{3Q}{4\pi R^3}4\pi r^2\Delta r

\Rightarrow V(r) = \frac{3Q}{4\pi\epsilon_{0}R^3}\int_{R}^r r^2 dr

Which is closer, but still evades the factor of 3 infront of R, and the factor of 8 on the bottom, and the powers of r and R are incorrect. =S
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top