Electrostatics: spherical shell

AI Thread Summary
A point charge Q_1 is placed at the center of a spherical conducting shell with total charge Q_2. The electric field inside the conductor is zero, leading to the conclusion that the charge on the inner surface of the shell is Q_a = -Q_1, while the charge on the outer surface is Q_b = Q_1 + Q_2. The electrostatic field and potential can be determined using Gauss's law, which shows that the electric field depends only on the radial distance from the center. The discussion emphasizes the importance of spherical symmetry in solving for the electric field and potential in this electrostatic scenario.
Bapelsin
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Electrostatics: spherical shell [SOLVED]

Homework Statement



A point charge Q_1 is located in the centre of a spherical conducting shell with inner radius a and outer radius b. The shell has total charge Q_2. Determine the electrostatic field \vec{E} and the potential \phi everywhere in space, and determine how much charge is on the inner and outer surfaces of the shell after electrostatic equilibrium has been reached.

Homework Equations



Gauss law: \oint_S\vec{E}\cdot d\vec{a} =\frac{ Q_{encl}}{\epsilon_0}
Area of a sphere: A=4\pi r^2
Surface charge density (homogenous charge distribution): \sigma = Q/A
Electric field from a point charge: \vec{E}(\vec{r})=\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\frac{Q}{r^2}\hat{r}
Electric field from a surface charge: \vec{E}(\vec{r})=\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\int_S\frac{\sigma da}{r^2}\hat{r}

The Attempt at a Solution



I call the charges on the inner and outer surfaces Q_a and Q_b respectively. The electric field inside a conductor is always zero, so Gauss law on a surface a<r<b gives

0=\oint_S\vec{E}\cdot d\vec{a} =\frac{ Q_1+Q_a}{\epsilon_0}
\Rightarrow Q_a=-Q_1

The total charge of the conductor:

Q_2=Q_a+Q_b=Q_b-Q_1
\Rightarrow Q_b=Q_1+Q_2

The total electric field could be calculated by taking the sum of the electric field from each charge.

\vec{E}_{tot}(\vec{r})=\vec{E}(\vec{r})_1+\vec{E}(\vec{r})_a+\vec{E}(\vec{r})_b

E-field from the point charge:

\vec{E}_1(\vec{r})=\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\frac{Q_1}{r}\hat{r}

Introduce the surface charge density \sigma_{a,b}=Q_{a,b}/A_{sphere}

\begin{align*}\vec{E}_a(\vec{r})=&amp;\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\int_S\frac{\sigma da}{r^2}\hat{r} \\<br /> &amp;=\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\int_0^r\frac{Q_a da}{4\pi a^2 r^2}\hat{r} \\<br /> &amp;= \frac{Q_a}{16\pi^2\epsilon_0a^2}\int_S\frac{rdrd\theta}{r^2}\hat{r} \\<br /> &amp; =\frac{Q_a}{8\pi\epsilon_0a^2}\int_0^r\frac{1}{r}\hat{r} \\<br /> &amp; = \frac{Q_a}{8\pi\epsilon_0a^2}\left[ln|r|\right]_0^r<br /> \end{align*}

which does not make sense. Similar problems arise for E-field from \sigma_b. Can anyone help me out, please?

Thanks in advance.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Use the spherical symmetry of the problem: the magnitude of E depends only on r, and it is parallel with the radius at any point. As d\vec{a} is normal to the surface of the sphere and so is \vec{E}

<br /> \oint_S\vec{E} \cdot d\vec{a} =\oint_SEda<br />

where E is the magnitude of the electric field at distance r from the centre of the sphere, and it is the same at each point of the surface, therefore

<br /> \oint_S\vec{E} \cdot d\vec{a} =\oint_SEda<br /> = 4\pi r^2 E=\frac{ Q_{encl}}{\epsilon_0}

You know well that the electric field is zero inside the conducting shell, you know that the enclosed charge is Q1 for r<a and Q1+Q2 for r>b...

ehild
 
Thank you! That was really helpful.
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Struggling to make relation between elastic force and height'
Hello guys this is what I tried so far. I used the UTS to calculate the force it needs when the rope tears. My idea was to make a relationship/ function that would give me the force depending on height. Yeah i couldnt find a way to solve it. I also thought about how I could use hooks law (how it was given to me in my script) with the thought of instead of having two part of a rope id have one singular rope from the middle to the top where I could find the difference in height. But the...
Back
Top