Eliminating forces by taking a moment

  • Thread starter Thread starter yoleven
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Forces Moment
AI Thread Summary
Taking a moment around a point with a rigid connection allows for the elimination of linear forces acting through that point, such as Ax and Ay, but the moment Mx remains unless it is specifically addressed. When calculating moments, if a force does not act through the point of interest, it must be included in the moment equation. The discussion clarifies that a couple, which consists of two equal and opposite forces, generates a moment that remains constant regardless of the point of reference. The confusion arises regarding whether Mx is considered a couple or a moment, which affects its inclusion in the equations. Understanding these principles is essential for accurately solving problems involving rigid connections and moments.
yoleven
Messages
78
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



If I take a moment around a point with a rigid connection what forces do I eliminate at that connection?
If I have a reaction force in the Y direction, a reaction force in the X direction and a moment at that point can I eliminate Ry, Rx and Mx or does Mx remain.
Can you explain this a bit to me?
This lack of understanding is a stumbling block for me and it keeps tripping me up.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
yoleven said:

Homework Statement



If I take a moment around a point with a rigid connection what forces do I eliminate at that connection?

All of them. The moment \vec{M} about a point O due to a force \vec{F} acting at a displacement \vec{r} from O is given by \vec{M}=\vec{r}\times\vec{F}. If \vec{F} acts at O then \vec{r} is the zero vector, hence the moment is zero.
 
hi yoleven! :smile:

a (linear) force which goes through the point has zero moment about that point, so (to use your words) it can be ignored

a couple, ie a pair of equal and opposite forces which are not in-line and so result in a pure moment or torque (is that what you meant?), has the same moment about any point …

you can check this by just drawing it as two offset equal forces, then calculating the moment about a random point in the same plane :wink:
 
Okay. Bear with me...
If the force I'm finding doesn't act through the point I'm taking the moment about.

Say A is rigid connection... I'll have Ax, Ay and Mx. I have a known point load acting somewhere along the beam and I want to find 'By' located a certain perpendicular distance from A.

When I take the moment about point A, I know I eliminate the Ax and Ay but does Mx remain.

When I take moments about point A will I have 2 unknowns in the equation or just one?
 
is Mx a couple (in which case, shouldn't it be Mz)? … if so, it definitely stays in the equation :smile:

(i don't follow what you're saying about 2 unknowns :confused:)
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...

Similar threads

Back
Top