Eliminating Lambda to Solve Question 2(b) of Physics Homework

Cosmossos
Messages
100
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Hello ,
Please look at question 2 (b).
http://phstudy.technion.ac.il/~wn114101/hw/wn2010_hw05.pdf

I got that the lagragian is the potential energy (as in part a of the question)
How Do I eliminate the lamda so I can write the U (wave) as requested?
Or In Other word, How do I do b?
thanks
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Cosmossos said:

Homework Statement


Hello ,
Please look at question 2 (b).
http://phstudy.technion.ac.il/~wn114101/hw/wn2010_hw05.pdf

I got that the lagragian is the potential energy (as in part a of the question)
How Do I eliminate the lamda so I can write the U (wave) as requested?
Or In Other word, How do I do b?
thanks

Quick note: The Lagrangian is not the potential energy. It does have a potential term in it but it is not the potential energy; it is the difference between the kinetic energy and the potential energy.

The problem looks pretty straightforward. If you expand \lambda to the two terms inside the bracket and then combine the two integrals, you should get the form requested.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top