Energy and momentum conservation

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving energy and momentum conservation. It specifically examines the scenario of a soldier on skis firing a bullet horizontally and seeks to determine the distance the soldier will slide before coming to a stop, given certain parameters such as mass and coefficient of friction.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to apply conservation of momentum to find the initial speed of the soldier after firing the bullet and then uses energy considerations to calculate the stopping distance. Some participants question the correctness of the calculations and suggest there may be an error in the approach or assumptions made.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with some participants expressing uncertainty about the original poster's calculations. There is a suggestion that a typo might be involved, and participants are exploring the potential sources of error without reaching a consensus.

Contextual Notes

Participants are considering the implications of the coefficient of friction and the mass values provided in the problem. There is an acknowledgment of the need to verify the calculations against the stated parameters.

domagoj412
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
One more problem to solve...

A soldier on skis fires a bullet from rifle horizontally. After what distance will soldier stop moving if coefficient of friction between surface of skis and snow is 0,01. Mass of bullet is 0,01 kg, initial speed of fired bullet is 900 m/s and mass of soldier, rifle and skis is 60 kg?

Correct solution is: s=2,9 cm

With momentum conservation I have calculated initial horizontal speed of soldier:

m1*v1=m2*v2
60*v1=0,01*900
v1=0,15 m/s

Kinetic energy is wasted on friction:
Ek=W
Ek=F*s
1/2*mv^2=m*g*u*s (u is friction coef.)

s=11,47 cm

which is incorrect. Why?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your solution looks OK to me.
 
Doc Al said:
Your solution looks OK to me.

But something has to be wrong :mad:
 
A typo, perhaps? What book are you using?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
1K
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K