Energy in infinite square well

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the energy of a particle in an infinite square well defined from x=-L/2 to x=L/2. The user derived the energy formula E=(n^2*h^2)/(2mL^2) but noted a discrepancy when comparing it to the standard result E=(n^2*h^2)/(8mL^2) for a well from x=0 to x=L. The confusion stems from the application of boundary conditions and the impact of the well's position on the energy calculation. Another participant suggests that the user may have made an algebraic error, particularly in applying the boundary conditions. Ultimately, the user is seeking clarification on why the two methods yield different results despite the wells having the same width.
w3390
Messages
341
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Find the energy of a particle of mass m in an infinite square well with one end at x=-L/2 and the other at x=L/2.

Homework Equations



Schrodinger Equation

The Attempt at a Solution



To save time, I won't type the solving of the differential equation which results in the sin+cos terms. I eventually get to the point where I have found that \Psi(x)=Asin(2n*PI*x/L). Using boundary conditions, I found k=2n*PI/L.

From my differential equation, I have that k^2 = 2mE/h(bar)^2.

When I plug in k=2n*PI/L to the k^2 equation, it simplifies to:

E = (n^2*h^2)/(2mL^2)

My question is whether or not this is correct because when the infinite well has one end at x=0 and the other at x=L, the result is that:

E = (n^2*h^2)/(8mL^2)

It shouldn't matter where the well is placed as long as the width is the same. Why am I getting two different answers?

Any help would be greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hmm, yeah, you should get the same answer and you've probably made an algebraic error somewhere. I would carefully go over the application of the boundary conditions in the -L/2 to +L/2 case.
 
I don't think it's an algebraic error. I have worked the problem through, once using endpoints x=0 and x=L and again using x=-L/2 and x=L/2 and I don't get the same answer.

In the case where I am going from 0 to L, I get that the energy is E=(n^2*h^2)/8mL^2, which is correct.

In the case where I am going from -L/2 to L/2, I have the factor of 1/2 that ends up that ends up getting squared and reducing the eight in the denominator to a 4.
 
Any ideas?
 
I have a very similar problem with yours but from -a to a. So if you have any idea or something we could help each other
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top