Orbiting Satellite Energy Conservation

  • Thread starter Thread starter oasis13
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Satellite
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the conservation of energy and angular momentum in the context of an orbiting satellite after a collision. The user is grappling with an imaginary final answer in their calculations and questions whether energy is conserved before and after the explosion, given that no work is done on the satellite. They assert that angular momentum should remain constant due to the absence of torque. The conversation highlights the importance of considering both kinetic and potential energy in the analysis. Clarification is sought on the application of the work-energy theorem in this scenario.
oasis13
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I have uploaded the question. See attachment "question001"

Homework Equations


L=mvR for circular orbit

The Attempt at a Solution


See attachment "answer001". The problem is that my final answer seems to be imaginary, and I have tried to look for mistakes in my algebra which would lead me to this and haven't found any. Am I wrong in assuming that the Energy before the explosion is the same as the energy after the collision? I assumed that because no work was done on the orbiting mass, the energy was conserved. And there is no torque acting so angular momentum should be conserved.

I would be really grateful if someone could point out where I am going wrong :smile:
 

Attachments

  • question001.jpg
    question001.jpg
    27.5 KB · Views: 427
  • answer001.jpg
    answer001.jpg
    20.1 KB · Views: 485
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The work-energy theorem refers to the change of kinetic energy. The KE of the satellite remains the same if no work was done on it. But what about the potential energy?

ehild
 

Thread 'Rolling without slipping on a curved surface'

Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
View full post »

Thread 'Struggling to understand the concept of this question (ice cube in water optics question)'

TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
View full post »

Similar threads

How Does Satellite Mass Impact Velocity Change for Circular Orbit Achievement?
Replies
5
Views
2K
Angular momentum for a bullet and a rod attached to a ceiling
Replies
17
Views
1K
Velocity of a satellite in a eccentric orbit
Replies
5
Views
2K
Speed of charged balls after collision
Replies
13
Views
1K
Using conservation of energy and momentum in projectile motion
Replies
18
Views
1K
Circular orbit change after gaining mass ejected from sun
Replies
1
Views
1K
Angular Momentum Conservation in Spacecraft Orbits
Replies
10
Views
2K
Conservation of Mechanical Energy - Which Equation To Use?
Replies
9
Views
1K
Criteria for Determining Satellite's Return from Orbit?
Replies
8
Views
1K
Angular momentum of a satellite
Replies
7
Views
8K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top