Energy spectrum of electromagnetic showers.

Silversonic
Messages
121
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Use the simple model for electromagnetic showers (explained below) to show that the energy spectrum of all secondary particles contained in an electromagnetic shower falls like E^{-2} for E_0 >> E >> E_c

The Attempt at a Solution



An electron or a photon with energy E_0 goes through an electromagnetic calorimeter and undergoes bremmstrahlung or pair production respectively after a radiation length. Hence after 1 radiation length there are 2 particles (considering photons as particles for ease), after 2 lengths there are 4 etc. So after t radiation lengths there are 2^t particles and each particle has a mean energy of \frac {E_0}{2^t}.

When the particle energy goes below the critical energy E_c the main source of energy loss is ionisation, the showering process then stops.

Now I'm confused by what the question actually wants and what is meant by "energy spectrum". Is it just asking for a given energy E, how many particles N will exist? Because that would just be \frac {E_0}{E}. It's not though, because the answer says;

The number of particles with energy exceeding E is

N(>E) = \int^{t(E)}_{0} N(t)dt

It then goes on to show N(>E) = \frac {E_0}{ln(2) E} and then says

"implying dN/dE \propto E^{-2}".

I'm entirely confused here. So what exactly was the quantity that was wanted? The rate of change (with E) of the amount of particles with energy greater than E?

But the way I see it the number of particles with energy greater than E is the same as the area under a graph of E versus N from E to E_0. i.e.

N(>E) = \int^{E_0}_{E} N(E)dE.

But N(E) = \frac {E_0}{E}

So the derivative of \int^{E_0}_{E} N(E)dE with respect to E is just N(E) = \frac {E_0}{E}

Why are there two different results for the same thing?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Am I missing something here?EDIT:The simple model for electromagnetic showers is that each particle undergoes bremmstrahlung or pair production after a radiation length and each daughter particle has half the energy of its parent.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top