Energy Threshold for 2 proton -> 2 proton 1 Pion

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the threshold energy required for a high-energy proton beam to produce pions in a collision with protons at rest, specifically through the reaction p + p --> p + p + ∏. Participants are exploring concepts related to energy and momentum conservation in particle physics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to balance energy equations and are questioning how to account for momentum without given velocities. There is confusion about whether the threshold energy refers to total energy or just kinetic energy. Some suggest analyzing the problem in the center-of-mass frame.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants sharing their attempts to set up equations based on energy conservation and invariant mass. There are indications of productive exploration of different frames of reference, but no consensus has been reached on the correct approach or solution.

Contextual Notes

Participants express confusion regarding the treatment of momentum and energy in different frames, as well as the implications of their equations. There is a mention of a quick overview by the professor that left some participants unclear about key concepts.

Goatsenator
Messages
18
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


When a beam if high-energy protons collides with protons at rest in the laboratory, pions are produced by the reaction p + p --> p + p + ∏. Compute the threshold energy of the protons in the beam for this reaction to occur.


Homework Equations



(mc^2)^2 = E^2 - (pc)^2
Einitial = Efinal

The Attempt at a Solution



I tried to do an energy balance but can't seem to get it right. I don't understand how to account for the momentum of the proton if I'm not given its velocity. How can the momentum of the first stage be equal to the momentum of the second stage if none of the particles are moving?

I think:

2x(rest energies of protons) + (Kinetic Energy of proton) = 2x(rest energies of protons) + (rest energy of pion)

Is the threshold energy the total energy (i.e. the rest energy and kinetic energy) of the proton that is moving, or is it just its kinetic energy? My professor went over this very quickly and wrote down that zero is equal to something which makes no sense to me. I'm pretty confused and the book isn't helping either. Can anyone clarify this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Goatsenator said:

Homework Statement


When a beam if high-energy protons collides with protons at rest in the laboratory, pions are produced by the reaction p + p --> p + p + ∏. Compute the threshold energy of the protons in the beam for this reaction to occur.


Homework Equations



(mc^2)^2 = E^2 - (pc)^2
Einitial = Efinal

The Attempt at a Solution



I tried to do an energy balance but can't seem to get it right. I don't understand how to account for the momentum of the proton if I'm not given its velocity. How can the momentum of the first stage be equal to the momentum of the second stage if none of the particles are moving?
It can't, so the two protons and the pion must be moving after the interaction.

I think:

2x(rest energies of protons) + (Kinetic Energy of proton) = 2x(rest energies of protons) + (rest energy of pion)

Is the threshold energy the total energy (i.e. the rest energy and kinetic energy) of the proton that is moving, or is it just its kinetic energy? My professor went over this very quickly and wrote down that zero is equal to something which makes no sense to me. I'm pretty confused and the book isn't helping either. Can anyone clarify this?
Try analyzing the problem in the center-of-mass frame, and then transform back to the lab frame.
 
OH! Okay I think I get it now! So when I view it from the COM frame both of the protons appear to have equal kinetic energies when they collide so that is the threshold energy? And then after the collision there appears to be no movement of the particles relative to one another?
 
Goatsenator said:
OH! Okay I think I get it now! So when I view it from the COM frame both of the protons appear to have equal kinetic energies when they collide so that is the threshold energy?
No. You're trying to find the energy of the incident beam as measured in the lab frame. It's related to the threshold energy as measured in the COM frame, but they are not the equal.

And then after the collision there appears to be no movement of the particles relative to one another?
This is true in both frames. Perhaps you didn't write exactly what you meant?
 
I'm also kind of stuck on this.

So far I've got:

BEFORE the collision:

Using the invariant (E2 - c2p2) = (2mpc2)2 - c2(pp)2

Then AFTER the collision in the COM frame:

(E2 - c2p2) = (mpc2+mpc2+mc2)2

Then to get the threshold I'm equating the two equations and solving for mpc2. However, I can't seem to the the momentum term to cancel. Or I can't simplify it to get an equation for the energy.

Any help?
 
LeePhilip01 said:
I'm also kind of stuck on this.

So far I've got:

BEFORE the collision:

Using the invariant (E2 - c2p2) = (2mpc2)2 - c2(pp)2
I'm not sure what you did here.

Then AFTER the collision in the COM frame:

(E2 - c2p2) = (mpc2+mpc2+mc2)2

Then to get the threshold I'm equating the two equations and solving for mpc2. However, I can't seem to the the momentum term to cancel. Or I can't simplify it to get an equation for the energy.

Any help?
 
I just took the E of the two protons ( = 2 x mpc2 ) and subtracted the product of c2 and the momentum of the incoming proton, all squared. As in the invariant.

The second part in the COM frame has no momentum so is just the sum of the E components.

Is this wrong?
 
Since the incoming proton is moving, its energy isn't equal to its rest energy, which is what you seem to be saying.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
11K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
6K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K