Entropy of mixing, non-isolated system

pieterb
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Take a container of volume V, which has two separated partitions, each with volume V/2. Each partition contains a gas of N molecules, with respectively mass \m_{a} and \(m_{b}\). The temperature in the partitions is equal to that of its surroundings, and energy exchange between the molecules in the partitions with the outside is possible.

When the partition between gases A and B are removed, what happens to the quantities U, P and S?


Homework Equations


\Delta S = -R (x ln x + (1-x) ln (1-x) )


The Attempt at a Solution



I'm guessing this should be done with the Gibbs free energy distribution. The problem seems trivial in the case of an isolated system, the only increase in entropy is because of the increase in potential volume for each molecule. What happens however, when there exchange of energy with the environment is allowed?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
pieterb said:
What happens however, when there exchange of energy with the environment is allowed?
There is no net exchange of energy with the surroundings since the gas and the surroundings are at the same temperature. So there is no change in entropy of the surroundings.

AM
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...

Similar threads

Back
Top