• Support PF! Buy your school textbooks, materials and every day products Here!

Equilibrium and principle of moments

  • #1

Homework Statement



upload_2016-5-14_20-34-7.png


Homework Equations



Torque = F x D
Manticlockwise = Mclockwise

The Attempt at a Solution



From what I understand, the moment on left hand side of the pivot point needs to be equal to the moment on right hand side, therefore...

(Fx.2)+(5x.14) = (7xd)

My initial thinking was to substitute 2N into F, so that both forces on either side of pivot point are equal to 7N. However, this was not correct because the resultant forces were not in equilibrium after checking.

The answer in the book was this:
[/B]
upload_2016-5-14_21-16-11.png


Could someone explain to me why F wasn't factored into the working? The way I'm interpreting this is that there is no force acting at point F. Would this be a correct assumption?
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
CWatters
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
10,529
2,295
Looks like a badly worded question to me.

If you read Question (b) it says F replaces the 5N force. So F doesn't exist for question (a) ?
 
  • #3
CWatters
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
10,529
2,295
(Fx.2)+(5x.14) = (7xd)
If F does exist for (a) then that's correct but you can't solve it. You have one equation and two unknowns so best you can do is write an equation for d in terms of F.
 
  • #4
NascentOxygen
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
9,244
1,071
Could someone explain to me why F wasn't factored into the working?
Part (b) explains that F acting at a distance 200mm is used in (b) as the substitute for the 5N force at a distance 140mm.

So the diagram is doing double-duty, and F is relevant only to part (b).
 

Related Threads on Equilibrium and principle of moments

  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
859
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
746
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Top