Equilibrium Temperature with three substances

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the equilibrium temperature when a block of lead is placed in a calorimeter with aluminum and water. The initial calculations for the final temperature (Tf) were presented, but there was confusion regarding the application of the equations. The formula used, Tf=((m1c1T1 + m2c2T2 + m3c3T3)/(m1c1 + m2c2 + m3c3)), was noted to be inconsistent with the heat transfer principles. Participants emphasized the importance of ensuring that the heat lost by the lead equals the heat gained by the water and aluminum. The final temperature was initially calculated as 40.1 degrees Celsius, but further verification of the calculations was suggested.
ContagiousIntellect

Homework Statement


If a block of 250 grams of lead (specific heat (c) =130) at 315 degrees celsius is placed in a 200 gram aluminum (c=900) calorimeter cup containing 900 grams of water (c=4.1), and the calorimeter and the water are both initially at 15 degrees celsius, what is the equilibrium temperature ?

Homework Equations


Q=mcΔt
Tf=(mct+mct+mct)/(mc+mc+mc)

The Attempt at a Solution


Tf=((250x900x315)+(200x900x15)+(900x4.1x15))/((250x130)+(200x900)+(900x4.1)
Tf=(70875000+2700000+55350)/(32500+180000+3690)
Tf=40.1
I'm not sure if I'm on the right track.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Try to approach it in a systematic way - for a single substance Q=mcΔt, for the whole system

\sum_i m_ic_i\Delta T_i = 0

where \Delta T_i = T_{final} -T_{initial(i)} (Tfinal is common for all substances present).
 
What are the units of specific heat, if lead is 130, aluminium is 900 and water is 4.1?
 
  • Like
Likes Borek
ContagiousIntellect said:

Homework Statement


If a block of 250 grams of lead (specific heat (c) =130) at 315 degrees celsius is placed in a 200 gram aluminum (c=900) calorimeter cup containing 900 grams of water (c=4.1), and the calorimeter and the water are both initially at 15 degrees celsius, what is the equilibrium temperature ?

Homework Equations


Q=mcΔt
Tf=(mct+mct+mct)/(mc+mc+mc)

The Attempt at a Solution


Tf=((250x900x315)+(200x900x15)+(900x4.1x15))/((250x130)+(200x900)+(900x4.1)
Tf=(70875000+2700000+55350)/(32500+180000+3690)
Tf=40.1
I'm not sure if I'm on the right track.
The math is not consistent with your second Relevant equation. Try again.
 
  • Like
Likes Bystander
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top