Equivalent Resistance and Branch Currents in Non-simple Circuits

AI Thread Summary
To find equivalent resistance and branch currents in complex circuits, applying Kirchhoff's Voltage Law (KVL) and Kirchhoff's Current Law (KCL) is essential, though it may lead to circular calculations. The assumption of treating the input current as if it comes from a battery with ε = i*R_equivalent can be useful. When traditional series or parallel combinations are not apparent, Δ-Y transformations and symmetry can simplify the analysis. Recognizing symmetrical properties allows for the identification of equivalent nodes, enabling the replacement of certain components with half-value resistors. Utilizing these techniques can effectively lead to a clearer understanding of the circuit's behavior.
BeRiemann
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
I'm asked to find an equivalent resistance and the current through each branch of the following circuits. (r is a fixed arbitrary value for all resistors in the circuits)

IMAG0063.jpg

IMAG0064.jpg

Homework Equations


V=IR
Sum of I at a node = 0
Sum of V about a closed loop = 0

The Attempt at a Solution


I've been playing with both KVL and KCL equations trying get a working answer, but none of my attempts seem to be anything but cyclically finding me zero. My problem is how I consider the input current. Is it right to make the assumption that I essentially have a battery there which has the value of ε = i*R_equivalent. The circuits cannot be broken down in terms of parallel or series from what I've seen.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you familiar with \Delta -Y conversions? I would start by implementing these conversions to determine equivalent resistances.
 
Sometimes symmetry offers opportunities for circuit simplification, particularly in 'contrived' circuits like these; the problems are designed to get you to think about and recognize these opportunities. Take the first circuit for example.

Yes, when you don't find obvious serial or parallel resistor combinations to exploit you could bring out bigger and better weapons like Δ-Y transformations or even mesh or nodal analysis. But you might also recognize the fact that there is a line of symmetry running through the circuit, where the top half is a mirror image of the bottom half. What does that do for you? It means that the currents in each of the "reflected" paths and components will be the same. It also means that image-pairs of nodes will have the same potential.

When two nodes always have the same potential they are essentially equivalent nodes. You could run a wire between those nodes and it would not affect circuit operation in any way. In effect then you can treat them as being the same node! When you do that, a number of new effective parallel connections appear.

Imagine folding the circuit along the line of symmetry. Any components that get overlaid with their mirror partner are now parallel pairs -- so replace them with half value resistors. Observe the new simplified circuit!
 
I'm not familiar with delta-Y conversions, but I'll have to take a look at them if they're useful.
I was thinking along those same paths for symmetry, my biggest obstacle was just knowing if it was actually a valid technique. Thanks!
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top