Equivalent Resistance in partial parallel/series cicuit

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the equivalent resistance between points A and B in a circuit with both series and parallel components. Initial attempts to simplify the circuit led to confusion regarding the arrangement of resistors, particularly the placement of a 3-ohm resistor affecting series and parallel combinations. Correct identification of series and parallel relationships is crucial, with emphasis on combining resistors step by step to avoid errors. The final equivalent resistance can be derived by carefully applying the series and parallel resistance formulas. Understanding the configuration of resistors is essential for accurate calculations in circuit analysis.
thatgirlyouknow
Messages
57
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Find the equivalent resistance between points A and B in the drawing.

Homework Equations



Rseries = R1+R2+R3...
Rparallel: 1/Rp = 1/R1+1/R2+1/R3...


The Attempt at a Solution



Reducing it down:
1/8+1/9 = 1/R1 = 4.235
That's in parallel with 20, so:
1/20+1/4.235 = 3.495 ohms

3, 4, and 6 are in series:
3+4+6 = 13 ohms
Add that to the previous and you have 16.495 ohms, which is incorrect.

Is one parallel and I'm not adding it as such? Or should I combine differently?

Thanks so much!
 

Attachments

  • circuit2.gif
    circuit2.gif
    2 KB · Views: 2,650
Physics news on Phys.org
thatgirlyouknow said:
Reducing it down:
1/8+1/9 = 1/R1 = 4.235
Good. R1 = 4.235 (not 1/R1).
That's in parallel with 20, so:
Nope. The 3 ohm resistor is in the way.
 
So then 20 and 3 are in series, right?
20+3=23 ohms

So now my drawing has:

23 ohms . 4 ohms

4.235 ohms

. 6 ohms

Would the 4 and 6 be considered series?
 
4+6 are in series
9+8 are in parallel
3 and 20 are not in series!

You need to do this step by step...

6+4 = 10
1/8 + 1/9 = 17/72
now you have

------3 -----------
--|--------|------|
-20------17/72--10
--|--------|------|
-------------------

Next you have 17/72 and 10 in parallel.

1/10+72/17 = 737/170

-- -- 3 -------
--|---------|
-20------737/170
--|---------|
--------------

Now the 3 and 737/170 are in series so just add them to get

-------------
--|---------|
-20-------1147/170
--|---------|
-------------

Now these are in parallel you can solve!
 
When you added for 17/72 and 10 in parallel, shouldn't it have been 1/4.235+1/10 = 1/R = 2.975?

so then with
------3--------
| |
20 2.975
| |
------------

So now which should I combine first?
 
first take this and then you shall have the feel of the question much better..""

General rules for doing the reduction process include:

1. Two (or more) resistors with their heads directly connected together and their tails directly connected together are in parallel, and they can be reduced to one resistor using the equivalent resistance equation for resistors in parallel.

2. Two resistors connected together so that the tail of one is connected to the head of the next, with no other path for the current to take along the line connecting them, are in series and can be reduced to one equivalent resistor.

Finally, remember that for resistors in series, the current is the same for each resistor, and for resistors in parallel, the voltage is the same for each one
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top