Replacing Resistors in Series: Equivalent Resistance and Calculation

AI Thread Summary
Two resistors in series can indeed be replaced by a single resistor that provides equivalent resistance to the circuit. The relationship is defined by the formula R_eq = R1 + R2, where R_eq is the equivalent resistance. When replacing the series combination with one resistor, it does not remain in series with anything else in the circuit. The discussion also emphasizes the importance of clear communication to avoid repetitive questions. Understanding the calculation of equivalent resistance is crucial for circuit analysis.
mich_v87
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
Can two resistors in series be replaced by a single resistor and give an equivalent resistance to the circuit?

If so , how must the single resistance be related to the two in series ?
R=R1+R2 ? ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can two resistors in series be replaced by a single resistor and give an equivalent resistance to the circuit?

My answer is yes they can be replaced by a single equivalent resistance

buthow must the single resistance be related to the two in series ?

will it be in series !?
 
i mean do we use R=R1+R2? is this the answer ?
 
Yes, that's the answer. But I don't understand this: "will it be in series !?" Will it be in series with what? If you're replacing the whole series by one resistor, no.
 
yup that's right. R_e_q_u=R_1+R_2
 
mich_v87, I've merged your 2 identical questions. Could you please refrain from doing so in the future (except for accidental posting) ?
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top