Estimating Air Mass Inside Hot Air Balloon

BoogieBot
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Estimate the average temperature of the air inside a hot air balloon. Assume that the total mass of the unfilled balloon and payload is 500kg. what is the mass of the air inside the balloon?

No volume or radius is given, so I estimated V = 2800 m^3 & r = 8.75 m
estimate T = 370 Kelvin
mass of 1 molecule of air calculated to be 29.00 g/mol


Homework Equations



PV = NkT
m{air} = # of molecules[N] * mass of 1 molecule {m}
P = mass/volume


The Attempt at a Solution



PV = NkT ---> N = PV/kT

m{air} = (PV/kT)*m

I don't know how to find pressure w/o knowing the mass of air inside the balloon. P = F/A (surface area calculation is trivial so I'm not going to do it here). I assume F is the buoyant force?

In equilibrium, Fbuoy = Fgrav, so: Fbuoy = (m{air} + m{payload})* g

but it looks like I need m{air} to find Fbuoy. What do?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


What is the buoyant force that is required? Write the equation relating balloon volume and mass of the balloon + hot air and the mass of the displaced air (relate the densities of the hot air and displaced air to temperature using the ideal gas law). Hint: the pressure is the same inside as outside the balloon so: nRT/V is the same inside and outside. How is this related to density?

AM
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top