Estimating K$^+$ Decay Ratios Without Mass Dependence

  • Thread starter Thread starter GoodKopp
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Decay Ratios
GoodKopp
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Give a simple estimate of the ratio of decay rates for K^+ \rightarrow e^+ \nu_e / K^+ \rightarrow \mu^+ \nu_\mu.

Homework Equations



Fermi's Golden Rule for decay width \Gamma = \hbar W = 2\pi (dn/dE_f)|M_{if}|^2.

For comparison, from the PDG, \Gamma / \Gamma_i are 1.55 \pm 0.07 \times 10^{-5} and 63.44 \pm 0.14 for K^+ \rightarrow e^+ \nu_e and K^+ \rightarrow \mu^+ \nu_\mu, respectively.

The Attempt at a Solution



\frac{\Gamma (K^+ \rightarrow e^+ \nu_e)}{\Gamma (K^+ \rightarrow \mu^+ \nu_\mu)} = \frac{\frac{dn}{dE} e^+ \nu_e}{\frac{dn}{dE} \mu^+ \nu_\mu}

\frac{dn}{dE} = \frac{dn}{dp} \frac{dp}{dE}

Am I going about this the right way? Where do I go from here?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You have to include a very strong dependence on the e or mu mass.
This comes from the weak interaction.
The same factor comes up in pi decay.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...

Similar threads

Back
Top