Estimating the energy of an emitted photon in gamma decay

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the energy of a photon emitted during gamma decay, starting from an excited nuclear state. The key equation presented is Eγ ≈ ΔE - (ΔE)²/(2mc²), where ΔE = Ei - Ef, and the mass of the nucleus is crucial in the calculations. Participants debate the validity of initial assumptions regarding the masses of the nucleus before and after emission, emphasizing that the initial nucleus is at rest and has zero momentum. The approximation ΔE << mc² is highlighted as essential for simplifying the calculations and ensuring the derived photon energy remains positive. The conversation underscores the importance of correctly applying conservation laws and approximations in nuclear decay scenarios.
dungonyu
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Consider a nucleus which is initially at rest and in an excited state with energy Ei. It then
decays to a lower energy state with energy Ef by emitting a gamma-ray photon.
Show that the energy of the photon is approximately given by

Eγ≈ΔE−(ΔE)^2/(2mc^2)

where ΔE = Ei - Ef and m is the mass of the nucleus.Note that ΔE is of the order MeV and
hence ΔE << mc^2

Homework Equations



Relativistic energy-momemtum formula:
E^2=(mc^2)^2+( pc)^2

The Attempt at a Solution



If I consider Ei=m*c^2 and Ef=m'*c^2, where m' is the mass of the nucleus after the emission,

After some calculations with the formula by applying conservation of energy and momentum,

1. momentum of the photon equals to momentum of the nucleus in magnitude, Eγ=pc,

2. mc^2= "square root of (m'c^2)^2+( pc)^2" + Eγ

I get Eγ= ΔE−(ΔE)^2/(2mc^2), which does not have any approximation

Am I wrong in the very first step by assuming

Ei=m*c^2 and Ef=m'*c^2 ? and applying the formula but forgetting some important approximation?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Eγ= ΔE−(ΔE)^2/(2mc^2) gets negative for large ΔE, it has to be an approximation with limited validity.

You don't need the mass of the initial nucleus - it is at rest, it has zero momentum anyway.
 
mfb said:
Eγ= ΔE−(ΔE)^2/(2mc^2) gets negative for large ΔE, it has to be an approximation with limited validity.

You don't need the mass of the initial nucleus - it is at rest, it has zero momentum anyway.

I don't understand. Shouldn't I approximate the energy of the emitted photon with the mass of the nucleus? And after the emission, both the photon and the nucleus carry non zero momentum.

I have enriched my steps in attempt. And I just wonder whether my first assumptions on Ei and Ef are correct
 
dungonyu said:
Shouldn't I approximate the energy of the emitted photon with the mass of the nucleus?
With the energy difference for the nucleus.
And after the emission, both the photon and the nucleus carry non zero momentum.
Sure, but you don't have the initial nucleus after the emission.

As ΔE << mc^2, you can use the nonrelativistic momentum of the nucleus.

I have enriched my steps in attempt. And I just wonder whether my first assumptions on Ei and Ef are correct
There is still something missing, I think.

$$mc^2=\sqrt{(m'c^2)^2+(pc)^2} + Eγ$$
And what did you do afterwards?
 
mfb said:
With the energy difference for the nucleus.
Sure, but you don't have the initial nucleus after the emission.

As ΔE << mc^2, you can use the nonrelativistic momentum of the nucleus.

There is still something missing, I think.

$$mc^2=\sqrt{(m'c^2)^2+(pc)^2} + Eγ$$
And what did you do afterwards?

pc= Eγ. So (mc^2-Eγ)^2=(m'c^2)^2+(Eγ)^2

then
(mc^2)^2-2mc^2*(Eγ)+(Eγ)^2=(m'c^2)^2+(Eγ)^2
rearranging terms and cancelling (Eγ)^2 we get
2mc^2*(Eγ)= (mc^2)^2- (m'c^2)^2

if we assert Ei = mc^2 and Ef = m'c^2,
2mc^2*(Eγ)= (Ei)^2-(Ef)^2= (Ei-Ef)(Ei+Ef)=ΔE(2Ei-ΔE)

so by dividing 2mc^2, which is equal to 2Ei, the desired result follows. However is it awkward to assume that Ei = mc^2 because Ei is an excited energy level of the nucleus?
 
I think m should be the mass of the nucleus afterwards. Here you can use the assumption ΔE << mc^2 to fix that ;).
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top