Estimating the energy of an emitted photon in gamma decay

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the energy of a photon emitted during gamma decay, starting from an excited nuclear state. The key equation presented is Eγ ≈ ΔE - (ΔE)²/(2mc²), where ΔE = Ei - Ef, and the mass of the nucleus is crucial in the calculations. Participants debate the validity of initial assumptions regarding the masses of the nucleus before and after emission, emphasizing that the initial nucleus is at rest and has zero momentum. The approximation ΔE << mc² is highlighted as essential for simplifying the calculations and ensuring the derived photon energy remains positive. The conversation underscores the importance of correctly applying conservation laws and approximations in nuclear decay scenarios.
dungonyu
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Consider a nucleus which is initially at rest and in an excited state with energy Ei. It then
decays to a lower energy state with energy Ef by emitting a gamma-ray photon.
Show that the energy of the photon is approximately given by

Eγ≈ΔE−(ΔE)^2/(2mc^2)

where ΔE = Ei - Ef and m is the mass of the nucleus.Note that ΔE is of the order MeV and
hence ΔE << mc^2

Homework Equations



Relativistic energy-momemtum formula:
E^2=(mc^2)^2+( pc)^2

The Attempt at a Solution



If I consider Ei=m*c^2 and Ef=m'*c^2, where m' is the mass of the nucleus after the emission,

After some calculations with the formula by applying conservation of energy and momentum,

1. momentum of the photon equals to momentum of the nucleus in magnitude, Eγ=pc,

2. mc^2= "square root of (m'c^2)^2+( pc)^2" + Eγ

I get Eγ= ΔE−(ΔE)^2/(2mc^2), which does not have any approximation

Am I wrong in the very first step by assuming

Ei=m*c^2 and Ef=m'*c^2 ? and applying the formula but forgetting some important approximation?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Eγ= ΔE−(ΔE)^2/(2mc^2) gets negative for large ΔE, it has to be an approximation with limited validity.

You don't need the mass of the initial nucleus - it is at rest, it has zero momentum anyway.
 
mfb said:
Eγ= ΔE−(ΔE)^2/(2mc^2) gets negative for large ΔE, it has to be an approximation with limited validity.

You don't need the mass of the initial nucleus - it is at rest, it has zero momentum anyway.

I don't understand. Shouldn't I approximate the energy of the emitted photon with the mass of the nucleus? And after the emission, both the photon and the nucleus carry non zero momentum.

I have enriched my steps in attempt. And I just wonder whether my first assumptions on Ei and Ef are correct
 
dungonyu said:
Shouldn't I approximate the energy of the emitted photon with the mass of the nucleus?
With the energy difference for the nucleus.
And after the emission, both the photon and the nucleus carry non zero momentum.
Sure, but you don't have the initial nucleus after the emission.

As ΔE << mc^2, you can use the nonrelativistic momentum of the nucleus.

I have enriched my steps in attempt. And I just wonder whether my first assumptions on Ei and Ef are correct
There is still something missing, I think.

$$mc^2=\sqrt{(m'c^2)^2+(pc)^2} + Eγ$$
And what did you do afterwards?
 
mfb said:
With the energy difference for the nucleus.
Sure, but you don't have the initial nucleus after the emission.

As ΔE << mc^2, you can use the nonrelativistic momentum of the nucleus.

There is still something missing, I think.

$$mc^2=\sqrt{(m'c^2)^2+(pc)^2} + Eγ$$
And what did you do afterwards?

pc= Eγ. So (mc^2-Eγ)^2=(m'c^2)^2+(Eγ)^2

then
(mc^2)^2-2mc^2*(Eγ)+(Eγ)^2=(m'c^2)^2+(Eγ)^2
rearranging terms and cancelling (Eγ)^2 we get
2mc^2*(Eγ)= (mc^2)^2- (m'c^2)^2

if we assert Ei = mc^2 and Ef = m'c^2,
2mc^2*(Eγ)= (Ei)^2-(Ef)^2= (Ei-Ef)(Ei+Ef)=ΔE(2Ei-ΔE)

so by dividing 2mc^2, which is equal to 2Ei, the desired result follows. However is it awkward to assume that Ei = mc^2 because Ei is an excited energy level of the nucleus?
 
I think m should be the mass of the nucleus afterwards. Here you can use the assumption ΔE << mc^2 to fix that ;).
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top