Evaluate Area of R: Change of Variables

Dustinsfl
Messages
2,217
Reaction score
5
Let R be the elliptical regin in the first quadrant by x^2/3^2+y^2/2^2=1. x=3u, y=2v, evaluate the area of R.

How do I setup the double integral? By this I mean what do I put in for f(g(u,v),h(u,v))jacobian dudv?

I know the bounds of u and v and the Jacobian but I not sure what to do for g and h. Would that be just pluging 3u and 2v into x^2 and y^2, respectively? But what happens to the 1 in the eqaution?

So by solving the (u,v) cordinates, one comes up with (0,0); (1,0); and (0,1).
The Jacobian is 6.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When you substitute your u's and v's for the x's and y's of the equation, for your region A in the xy plane you get a new region B in the uv plane. The point of the substitution is that instead of integrating

Area = \int \int_A 1\ dydx

over the region A in the xy plane, which is "ugly", you can instead calculate

Area = \int \int_B 1 J\ dudv

using u-v limits in the uv plane. If your new region B is nice, you may easily work out the new integral, or even avoid working it at all.
 
So the integral is just 0<=u<=1 and 0<=v<=-u+1 dvdu with no equation in the the integral?
 
Dustinsfl said:
So the integral is just 0<=u<=1 and 0<=v<=-u+1 dvdu with no equation in the the integral?

No. You need to draw a graph of your uv equation in the uv plane and use it to figure out correct limits.
 
The drawing is a triangle and those are the bounds. I am not concerned about them. I am trying to figure out what f(g(u,v),h(u,v)) are inside the integrals. Is it 1? Is it u+v not considering the 1 or is it u+v-1?
 
Last edited:
Dustinsfl said:
The drawing is a triangle and those are the bounds. I am concerned about them. I am trying to figure out what f(g(u,v),h(u,v)) are inside the integrals. Is it 1? Is it u+v not considering the 1 or is it u+v-1?

Are you trying to tell me that when you substitute x=3u, y=2v into the equation:

\frac {x^2}{3^2}+\frac {y^2}{2^2}=1

that the graph you get in the uv plane is a triangle?

Your integrand, once you figure out the proper area, will be 1 times the Jacobian.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top