Evaluation of work in thermodynamics

DottZakapa
Messages
239
Reaction score
17
Inside a cylinder with a sliding piston, n mole of monoatomic ideal gas at temperature TA occupy a volume VA at pressure PA, in equilibrium. The piston is expanded very slowly, turning the pressure in such a way that the product V⋅P2 remains constant till the volume VB .

I have to evaluate the work in the transformation from A to B:
VB = 4 VA
PA and VA are known

wAB = ∫ P⋅dV =

My question is:
- Which value of Pressure shall I insert instead of P considering the fact that it isn't constant during the transformation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If VP2 remains constant, it must be equal to VP2 in state A. Can you write an equation to express this in terms of PA and VA?

Chet
 
DottZakapa said:
My question is:
- Which value of Pressure shall I insert instead of P considering the fact that it isn't constant during the transformation?
Express P as a function of V.
 
VA⋅PA2=VB⋅PB2
Then
PA=(VB½⋅PB)/VA½
and then I substitute in the integral:
∫ (VB½⋅PB)/VA½ dV

is it ?
 
DottZakapa said:
VA⋅PA2=VB⋅PB2
Then
PA=(VB½⋅PB)/VA½
and then I substitute in the integral:
∫ (VB½⋅PB)/VA½ dV

is it ?
Not exactly. VP2=VAPA2

Solve for P and then integrate PdV between VA and VB.
 
Aw ok! now i get it.
Thank you very much for your time. Very helpful.
Have a nice day : )
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top