Expectation value of momentum in symmetric 2D H.O

ma18
Messages
93
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Consider the following inital states of the symmetric 2D harmonic oscillator

ket (phi 1) = 1/sqrt(2) (ket(0)_x ket(1)_y + ket (1)_x ket (0)_y)

ket (phi 2) = 1/sqrt(2) (ket(0)_x ket(0)_y + ket (1)_x ket (0)_y)

Calculate the <p_x (t)> for each state

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



I am not sure how to work with these kets, I know that for the expectation value using you would do
<phi_1 | p_x (t) | phi_2>

but I don't know how to represent p_x (t) in the notation used in the ketsAny help would be much appreciated.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The expectation value for an operator on a state is <state 1| operator |state 1>. You wrote <state 1| operator |state 2>. Note the 2 in the last ket. That's a transition amplitude as induced by the operator.

Look in your text for a representation of the momentum operator. You should find it near he Heisenberg uncertainty formula, or the Schrodinger equation or some such. You probably want a derivative with some constants.

Notice that the problem says "initial states." So these are not the wave functions. These are the t=0 values. It does not give the x dependence, nor the t dependence. You will need to do some reading in your text to find the 2-D harmonic oscillator and the general solution for it.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top