Explanation of quality factors for a circuit

batm
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



What does it mean physically if Q < 1 for a particular circuit? What would happen, for
instance, if a switch were suddenly closed which completed the circuit by a wire rather
than the ac supply?

Homework Equations



I've already derived the equation for Q (the quality factor)
Q = 1/R *(L/C)^.5

The Attempt at a Solution



When Q is less than 1 this means that energy dissipated during a period is greater than the energy store. I also know that the bandwidth is wide when Q is small. I'm not sure how else to answer the question.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
batm said:
1. When Q is less than 1 this means that energy dissipated during a period is greater than the energy store. I also know that the bandwidth is wide when Q is small. I'm not sure how else to answer the question.


You have already answered the question correctly. More exactly:
Q = 2π*(max energy stored within 1 cycle)/(energy dissipated per cycle).

In a series R-L-C circuit at resonance, total energy stored is a constant so you don't need to specify "peak". In this case, an equally valid definition of Q is ω0/Δω

where ω is radian frequency and Δω is the half-power bandwidth.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Back
Top