Exponential rule on y = (1+x)^(1/x)

  • Thread starter Thread starter LearninDaMath
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Exponential
LearninDaMath
Messages
295
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement

I am of the conclusion that, under any circumstance, the extended exponential rule can not be applied to (1+x)^{1/x}.

Thus, there is no way for the extended exponential rule to arise when taking the derivative of:

f(x) = (1+x)^{\frac{1}{x}}e^{x}

For instance, if my first step for finding the derivative of this function was to apply the product rule, i'd get:

f'x = ((1+x)^{\frac{1}{x}})'(e^{x}) + ((1+x)^{\frac{1}{x}})(e^{x})'

And in the next step, if I were to take the derivatives by first applying the exponential rule to (1+x)^{1/x},

I would get an incorrect outcome because while I could apply the exponential rule to something like b^x, I would not be able to apply exponential rule to something like (b+x)^x

Is this correct so far?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If what you mean by the "exponential rule" is the rule for how to take the derivative of something like ax, then you're right that you can't use it for things like xx. It is however easy to rewrite the thing that you don't know how to deal with, as something that you do know how to deal with. For example,
$$x^x=e^{\log x^x}=e^{x\log x}.$$
 
LearninDaMath said:

Homework Statement



I am of the conclusion that, under any circumstance, the extended exponential rule can not be applied to (1+x)^{1/x}.

Thus, there is no way for the extended exponential rule to arise when taking the derivative of:

f(x) = (1+x)^{\frac{1}{x}}e^{x}

For instance, if my first step for finding the derivative of this function was to apply the product rule, i'd get:

f'x = ((1+x)^{\frac{1}{x}})'(e^{x}) + ((1+x)^{\frac{1}{x}})(e^{x})'

And in the next step, if I were to take the derivatives by first applying the exponential rule to (1+x)^{1/x},

I would get an incorrect outcome because while I could apply the exponential rule to something like b^x, I would not be able to apply exponential rule to something like (b+x)^x

Is this correct so far?
As Fredrik said, you can often change the way you an expression to make it easier to work with.

For the example you give, you can use logarithmic differentiation, or rewrite the expression as follows.
\displaystyle <br /> f(x)=\Large e^{\ln\left((1+x)^{1/x}\right) } e^x

\displaystyle =\Large e^{\left( \frac{\ \ln(1+x)\ }{x} +x\right)}
 
Fredrik & Sammy, thank you both very much. I did not see this problem in the way you presented it. Thank you for showing me this way to approach functions of the form x^{x}.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Prove $$\int\limits_0^{\sqrt2/4}\frac{1}{\sqrt{x-x^2}}\arcsin\sqrt{\frac{(x-1)\left(x-1+x\sqrt{9-16x}\right)}{1-2x}} \, \mathrm dx = \frac{\pi^2}{8}.$$ Let $$I = \int\limits_0^{\sqrt 2 / 4}\frac{1}{\sqrt{x-x^2}}\arcsin\sqrt{\frac{(x-1)\left(x-1+x\sqrt{9-16x}\right)}{1-2x}} \, \mathrm dx. \tag{1}$$ The representation integral of ##\arcsin## is $$\arcsin u = \int\limits_{0}^{1} \frac{\mathrm dt}{\sqrt{1-t^2}}, \qquad 0 \leqslant u \leqslant 1.$$ Plugging identity above into ##(1)## with ##u...
Back
Top