Converting a Shifted Circle into Polar Coordinates

  • Thread starter Thread starter Tarhead
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Coordinate Polar
AI Thread Summary
To express a shifted circle in polar coordinates, the equation (x-h)² + (y-k)² = h² + k² requires transformations where x = r cos θ and y = r sin θ. The parameters h and k indicate a shift in the origin, necessitating four parameters to fully describe the circle in either Cartesian or polar coordinates. While the transformations can be applied, the constants h and k simplify the process, making it unnecessary to complicate the conversion. The discussion emphasizes that only two variables are needed to plot a one-dimensional object in a two-dimensional space. Understanding these transformations is crucial for accurately representing the shifted circle in polar coordinates.
Tarhead
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
How do I express this in polar coordinates?

(x-h)^2+(y-k)^2= h^2+k^2

It is a circle with k and h greater than 0.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
go to:

http://mathworld.wolfram.com/PolarCoordinates.html

I think the transforms would be

x--> rcos theta
y--> r sin theta
h --> R cos theta'
k --> R sin theta'

4 prameters to describe the points on a shifted circle (shifted orgin because of the k and h terms) in either cartesian or polar coordinates

Not sure, but I think.
 
In two dimensions, the transformations are:

x = r\cos \theta, \qquad y = r\sin \theta

That's all you need.
 
Yeah this makes sense. Sorry for my mistake. You'll only need two variables to plot a 1-d object in a 2d space.

You would need four parameters to specify a shifted circle in either coordinate system. (The k and h parameters will propagate through your transformation.) You could transform this shift into polar coordinates as well (and you would have to if this was a complicated mechanics problem) but you don't even need to bother with this because it is given as a constant.

Hope I didn't mess you up. Sorry again.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top