Expressing a potential inside a spherical shell as

dikmikkel
Messages
160
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The potential inside a spherical shell is given by:
V_{-}(x,y,z)= \frac{V_0}{R^2}(6z^2-3x^2-3y^2)
P_n(\cos(\theta )) where \theta is the polar angle.

The potential on the surface carries a surface charge density \sigma. Besides this, ther's no other charges and no outher field. The potential is rotational symmetric around the z-axis inside and outside, and goes to 0 far away from the sphere.

b) express the potential inside the spherical shell using a LegendrePolynomial

Homework Equations


In spherical coordinates i have:
V(r,\theta ) = \sum\limits_{l=0}^{\infty}(A_lr^lP_l(\cos(\theta)) = V_0(\theta)

The Attempt at a Solution


This is how far i made it. Now i suppose i could multiply it with P_{l'}(\cos( \theta ))\sin(\theta) and integrate, but i can't figure out how to simplify it and extract the solution.
I'm aware that the functions' are orthogonal, but the integral of a sum is something I've never done before.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You're making the problem more complicated than you need to. First, express the given V in terms of spherical coordinates and write all the trig functions in terms of cos θ. Then compare what you get to the Legendre polynomials.
 
Ha ha, yeah now i get it :) It's because normally we want to find the potential. But now i get it as the Legendre from 0 to 2, which makes sense by the order of the cartesian polynomial. So i am getting
\frac{3V_0r^2}{R^2}(3\cos(\theta)^2-1)
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top