Expression for induced ε from reducing Loop

AI Thread Summary
A circular loop made from flexible, conducting wire is shrinking in a steady magnetic field, and the task is to find the induced electromotive force (ε) as a function of time. The magnetic flux is calculated using the area of the loop multiplied by the magnetic field, leading to the expression ε(t) = (Bπ(r_0e^(βt))^2)/t. There is confusion regarding the differentiation of exponential functions and the correct application of calculus principles to derive the area and its rate of change. Clarification is provided on the derivative of exponential functions and the need to correctly express the area before differentiation. Understanding these calculus concepts is essential to solve the problem accurately.
quietriot1006
Messages
15
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A circular loop made from a flexible, conducting wire is shrinking. Its radius as a function of time is
render?tex=r+%3D+r_0+e%5E%7B-%5Cbeta+t%7D.gif
. The loop is perpendicular to a steady, uniform magnetic field B .
Find an expression for the induced ε in the loop at time t.
Give your answer in terms of
render?tex=r_0.gif
,
render?tex=%5Cbeta.gif
, t, B and appropriate constants.

Homework Equations


Magnetic Flux (Φm)=A*B
I(induced) = ε / R
ε =Absolute value of (dΦ/dt)

The Attempt at a Solution


At first get the magnetic flux using the Area * Magnetic field. Area is (pi)r^2 * B. I use this in faradays law with dt but i don't get the write expression. I end up getting

ε(t)=(B(pi)(r_0*e^(beta*t))^2)/t

I know I am differentiating somewhere wrong but i don't know where.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
What's the derivative of

f(t) = eat
 
Wouldnt that just be a'(t)e^at?
 
Uh, no. I meant for "a" to be a constant, sorry about the confusion.

If you can express r2 in the form:

r2 = ro2eat,​

and if you can take the derivative of eat correctly, then you'll be able to figure out what dA/dt is.
 
wouldn't the derivative of f(t)=e^at be just (1/a)e^at? I am not really sure and i don't understand how you were able to square the equation?
 
No, the derivative is
a eat

You'll have to figure out an expression for A, using A=∏r2, and differentiate it. I mentioned the whole eat thing because the expression for A could be put in that form.

It sounds like you're having trouble remembering calculus ... has it been a while since you took it?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top