Factorization of floor functions of fractions

DirichletHole
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
hey so

if you are taking a floor function of a fraction >1, is there any way to predict anything about it's factorization?

what about when the numerator is a factorial and the denominator is made up of factors that divide said factorial but to larger exponents then those that divide the factorial?

any info welcome
 
Physics news on Phys.org
DirichletHole said:
if you are taking a floor function of a fraction >1, is there any way to predict anything about it's factorization?

It isn't clear what you are asking. I suggest you give some examples.
 
ok. hmm...

say you are looking at floor(B/A)

based on B and/or A, is there anyway to determine the factors of floor(B/A)?

specifically B will be equal to x! (x factorial for any x that is a pos int) with all common factors of A removed. A will be x-smooth, less than B, and based on the rules for B clearly coprime to B, but aside from that there are no rules set for A. Is there perhaps an A s.t. floor(B/A) will have no prime factors less than or equal to x?
 
Counterexample: Let x=4.
A=x+1=5
B=4!=24, no factors to remove.
Clearly coprime.

floor(B/A)=4, which has a factor smaller than x=4.
 
mfb said:
Counterexample: Let x=4.
A=x+1=5
B=4!=24, no factors to remove.
Clearly coprime.

floor(B/A)=4, which has a factor smaller than x=4.

first off, one of the requirements of A is that it only has prime factors less then or equal to x.
secondly, I already know that it is very possible for an example such as you have given to exist. What I want to know is:
Are there PARAMETERS that make it impossible for floor(B/A) to have common factors with B?

in other words
when x is any positive integer > 3
for A is divisible only by prime factors less then or equal to x
for B = x! with all the prime factors shared with A divided out so that gcd(B,A) = 1
are there any functions that satisfy the requirements of A such that the following statement always holds true:
gcd(B, floor(B/A)) = 1
?
 
Thread 'Derivation of equations of stress tensor transformation'
Hello ! I derived equations of stress tensor 2D transformation. Some details: I have plane ABCD in two cases (see top on the pic) and I know tensor components for case 1 only. Only plane ABCD rotate in two cases (top of the picture) but not coordinate system. Coordinate system rotates only on the bottom of picture. I want to obtain expression that connects tensor for case 1 and tensor for case 2. My attempt: Are these equations correct? Is there more easier expression for stress tensor...
Back
Top