Fault analysis -- Simplifying to Thevenin equivalent

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the confusion regarding the persistence of a voltage source value of 1 after multiple source transformations in a circuit analysis problem. Participants emphasize that each transformation maintains equivalence to the original circuit configuration, which should logically preserve the initial voltage. One user reports calculating a voltage of -17.146 with a zero angle, indicating a potential error or misunderstanding in their approach. The thread highlights the importance of showing detailed working steps to clarify the transformations and results. Overall, the conversation underscores the complexities of applying Thevenin's theorem and the necessity of careful analysis in circuit simplifications.
edsoneicc
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


LA7MrYv.png
[/B]
All voltages and impedances are in per unit values.
After all the source transformations, why is the voltage source still 1 ?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


kHGW21O.png
[/B]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Each transformation produces something that is equivalent to what existed before the transformation. So after any number of transformations, including some that reverse previous transformations, it is inevitable that you must end up with something still equivalent to the very first arrangement.
 
I actually tried solving it and I got V=-17.146 with zero angle
 
edsoneicc said:
I actually tried solving it and I got V=-17.146 with zero angle
Please attach your working.
 

Similar threads

Replies
42
Views
6K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Back
Top