I am not sure of what to take permutations. Do I simply take any group, say S3, work out the permutations, then find a condition in which the permutations of S3 commute?
Yep.
You might try a few different permutation groups, just in case S
3 isn't representative of the general case. Varying the types of things over which you search is good practice in general.
And, it turns out, that it is important in this case; S
3 really isn't a very good representative of the general case. While you can find permutations that commute in S
3, it probably won't be enough to suggest the general result. I would suggest considering permutations over 4 or more objects.
Yes. I think I got this. Is this because the Group is finite?
Almost; it's because z has
finite order.
When studying complex numbers, did you ever have to do the fun problem of computing the value of i^2003? The trick is to decompose the exponent as:
i^(2003) = i^(2000) * i^3 = (i^4)^500 * i^3 = 1^500 * i^3 = i^3 = -i
The same principle is at work in groups. If x has finite order, that means that x^k = 1 for some nonzero value of k. Then, if we want to know what x^n is for n >= k (or n < 0), we can apply the above trick to reduce the problem to computing x^m for some m in the range [0, k).
And, incidentally, you may or may not have seen the entire group. In particular, you have only touched the cyclic subgroup that is generated by z; in principle, there could be just about anything else in the rest of the group! For example, the group itself could be nonabelian, even though x and y commute. "Nonabelian group" just says that
some elements don't commute, it doesn't say
all elements don't commute.
BTW, after doing the first exercise, I noticed that the elements produced looked like the dihedral group D6. I'm not sure what that would mean in the context of the excerises you gave me Hurkyl.
I did not intend to point you towards D
6. I'm tired and my algebra book isn't handy so I may be wrong, but isn't D
6 nonabelian? If so, then TMK the (sub)group I had you generate only bears a superficial resemblance to D
6.
But it's a good observation nonetheless. It is often useful to express a group in terms of its
generators.