Find angle of polarizing sheet given original & transmitted intensity

  • Thread starter Thread starter MrMoose
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Angle Intensity
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the angle of the first polarizing sheet (θ) when a polarized light beam passes through two sheets, with the second sheet oriented at 90°. The transmitted intensity after both sheets is given as 0.10 of the original intensity. Initial calculations incorrectly assumed the first sheet's angle, leading to confusion about the correct values. The correct approach involves using the cosine function properties, resulting in valid angles of approximately 70.38° and 20°. The discussion highlights the importance of considering multiple solutions when using inverse trigonometric functions.
MrMoose
Messages
23
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A beam of polarized light is sent through a system of two polarizing sheets. Relative to the polarization direction of that incident light, the polarizing directions of the sheets are at angles θ for the first sheet and 90° for the second sheet. If 0.10 of the incident intensity is transmitted by the two sheets, what is θ?

Homework Equations



I1 = Io /2

I2 = I1 * cos^2(θ)

The Attempt at a Solution



The intensity of the beam after the first polarizing sheet is as follows:

I1 = Io /2

The intensity of the beam after the second polarizing sheet is as follows:

I2 = I1 * cos^2(θ)

Where θ is the angle difference between θ1 and θ2.

The problem tells you that the transmitted beam is 0.10 of the original beam:

I2 = 0.10 * Io

Substituting with the equations above:

I2 = 0.10 * Io = (Io/2) * cos^2(θ) and therefore:

0.10 = cos^2(θ)/2

Solving for θ:

θ =arccos(\sqrt{0.2})= 63°

Which means the angle of the first polarizing sheet is 63° out from 90° so the answer I get is:

27° or 153°

But this isn't correct according to the back of the book. Please help. Thanks in advance, MrMoose
 
Physics news on Phys.org
MrMoose said:
I1 = Io /2
That would be true if the original beam were unpolarized, but it isn't.
 
Thank you! I read that question over so many times and missed that part every time. I think I got it now:

I1 = Io*cos^2(θ1)

I2 = I1*cos^2(θ2)

Where θ2 = 90 - θ1

We also know that I2 = 0.10 * Io, therefore:

I2 = 0.1 * Io = Io * cos^2(θ1) * cos^2(90-θ1)

Io cancels out and you have:

0.1 = cos^2(θ1) * cos^2(90-θ1) = (cos(θ1) * cos(90-θ1))^2

Had to look up how to combine cosine functions for this next part:

2*Sqrt(0.1) = cos(2*θ1- 90) + cos(90)

Solving for θ1

θ1 = (arccos(2*sqrt(0.1)) + 90) / 2

θ1 = 70.38° which is one of the correct answers.

My final question is this: The book also says that 20° is correct. How do they get this solution?
 
MrMoose said:
My final question is this: The book also says that 20° is correct. How do they get this solution?
Whenever you execute an inverse trig function you need to be aware that there may be multiple valid answers. In this case, consider that cos x = cos -x.
 
Great, Thanks Haruspex.

So when I consider the following:

θ1 = (arccos(-2*sqrt(0.1)) + 90) / 2

I get θ1 = 109.62° , which is also 19.62° off the normal. That wraps it up!
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top