Find Apparent depth due to a non-homogenous liquid

emailanmol
Messages
296
Reaction score
0
THE ACTUAL PROBLEM:

A vessel of depth H is filled with a non-homogenous liquid whose refractive index varies with y as u=(2 -(y/H)), where y is measured from bottom of the vessel. Find the apparent depth as seen by an observer from above?
(Paraxial approximation is allowed)

RELEVANT EQUATIONS:

We know in paraxial approximation

u1/x=u2/y

Where u1 is refractive index of medium 1, x is object distance from surface, u2 is refractive index of surrounding medium , y2 is apparent depth.



MY ATTEMPT:

I took a differential strip of thickness dy at a height of y from bottom.
its refractive index is
(2-(y/H)-(dy/H)) and refractive index of element just below it is (2-(y/H))

Now,
Lets say that the image of the bottom of the vessel formed by refraction from all strips below this height y be at a distance x from the bottom.

Therefore, Its distance from the strip is y-x.

So using the formulae i mentioned.

(2-y/H)/(y-x)=
[(2-(y/H)-(dy/H))]/[y-x-dx)]

So ydx/H -2dx=-ydy/H+xdy/H.

After this am struck cause I cannot integrate.

I know other ways of solving this problem(mentioned in my textbook), but I want to know what exactly am I doing wrong here?
Any help/inputs will be really appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Never mind.I figured it out :-)

Admin can delete the thread
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top