Find forces acting on a combined beam with load.

  • Thread starter Thread starter dreamliner
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Beam Forces Load
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the forces acting on a combined beam with a distributed load. The user is uncertain about their calculations, particularly regarding the incorporation of forces and the correct distances from the center of gravity (cg) of the load to the support points. They split the beam into two halves to analyze it independently but are struggling with a specific error in their calculations. A participant confirms the user's approach regarding the distance from the cg to point A and clarifies that the resultant of the distributed load acts at the cg, providing further validation. The conversation emphasizes the importance of accurately determining distances and forces in beam analysis.
dreamliner
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
I was wondering if someone could have a look at my calculations. I believe I'm on the right track but I keep getting wrong answers, but I might be mixing + and - somewhere. I'm also a little unsure about the right way to incorporate the force working on top of the beam.

The task reads: A combined beam ABCD is resting on a hinged support in A, and on rollers in B and D. In C there is a frictionless joint. There is an evenly distributed load q on top of the beam. Calculate Ay, B and D.







The Attempt at a Solution


Due to the number of unknowns I split the beam in C and looked at the two halves independently.

I've attached my calculations as a file to this post. I'd appreciate it if someone could take a look.
 

Attachments

  • beam.jpg
    beam.jpg
    18.8 KB · Views: 445
Physics news on Phys.org
Your approach is very good but you are making the same error I pointed out earlier when calculating the distance from the cg of the load to the point A...you have an extra term in there , can you find it?
 
Yes I got a little impatient there. I tried to delete my first post and use this one instead since it was basically the same question, but no go there.

Anyway. Looking at Beam ABC from my drawing. If you are supposed to use the length from cg of the load to A, would this be correct:

q*4,3(the entire length of beam q is working on)*3,35(the length from cg of the load to A)?
 
dreamliner said:
Yes I got a little impatient there. I tried to delete my first post and use this one instead since it was basically the same question, but no go there.

Anyway. Looking at Beam ABC from my drawing. If you are supposed to use the length from cg of the load to A, would this be correct:

q*4,3(the entire length of beam q is working on)*3,35(the length from cg of the load to A)?
Yes, that is correct. The resultant of the distributed load, q*4,3, acts at the cg of the distributed load, 2,15 m from C, which is thus located 3,35 m from A.
 
Thank you.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top