Find forces acting on a combined beam with load.

  • Thread starter Thread starter dreamliner
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Beam Forces Load
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the forces acting on a combined beam with a distributed load. The beam is supported at various points, and the original poster is attempting to determine the reactions at these supports based on their calculations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster splits the beam at a joint to analyze the two halves independently. They express uncertainty about incorporating the load's effect and mention potential errors in their calculations. Other participants point out specific errors related to the distance calculations from the center of gravity of the load to the support points.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the original poster's calculations, providing feedback on specific errors and confirming some of the original poster's reasoning. There is a focus on clarifying the correct distances and the resultant forces from the distributed load.

Contextual Notes

The problem involves a combined beam with specific support conditions and a distributed load, which introduces complexity in calculating reactions. The original poster has shared calculations for review, indicating a collaborative effort to identify and correct misunderstandings.

dreamliner
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
I was wondering if someone could have a look at my calculations. I believe I'm on the right track but I keep getting wrong answers, but I might be mixing + and - somewhere. I'm also a little unsure about the right way to incorporate the force working on top of the beam.

The task reads: A combined beam ABCD is resting on a hinged support in A, and on rollers in B and D. In C there is a frictionless joint. There is an evenly distributed load q on top of the beam. Calculate Ay, B and D.







The Attempt at a Solution


Due to the number of unknowns I split the beam in C and looked at the two halves independently.

I've attached my calculations as a file to this post. I'd appreciate it if someone could take a look.
 

Attachments

  • beam.jpg
    beam.jpg
    18.8 KB · Views: 458
Physics news on Phys.org
Your approach is very good but you are making the same error I pointed out earlier when calculating the distance from the cg of the load to the point A...you have an extra term in there , can you find it?
 
Yes I got a little impatient there. I tried to delete my first post and use this one instead since it was basically the same question, but no go there.

Anyway. Looking at Beam ABC from my drawing. If you are supposed to use the length from cg of the load to A, would this be correct:

q*4,3(the entire length of beam q is working on)*3,35(the length from cg of the load to A)?
 
dreamliner said:
Yes I got a little impatient there. I tried to delete my first post and use this one instead since it was basically the same question, but no go there.

Anyway. Looking at Beam ABC from my drawing. If you are supposed to use the length from cg of the load to A, would this be correct:

q*4,3(the entire length of beam q is working on)*3,35(the length from cg of the load to A)?
Yes, that is correct. The resultant of the distributed load, q*4,3, acts at the cg of the distributed load, 2,15 m from C, which is thus located 3,35 m from A.
 
Thank you.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K