Find forces acting on a combined beam with load.

  • Thread starter Thread starter dreamliner
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Beam Forces Load
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the forces acting on a combined beam with a distributed load. The user is uncertain about their calculations, particularly regarding the incorporation of forces and the correct distances from the center of gravity (cg) of the load to the support points. They split the beam into two halves to analyze it independently but are struggling with a specific error in their calculations. A participant confirms the user's approach regarding the distance from the cg to point A and clarifies that the resultant of the distributed load acts at the cg, providing further validation. The conversation emphasizes the importance of accurately determining distances and forces in beam analysis.
dreamliner
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
I was wondering if someone could have a look at my calculations. I believe I'm on the right track but I keep getting wrong answers, but I might be mixing + and - somewhere. I'm also a little unsure about the right way to incorporate the force working on top of the beam.

The task reads: A combined beam ABCD is resting on a hinged support in A, and on rollers in B and D. In C there is a frictionless joint. There is an evenly distributed load q on top of the beam. Calculate Ay, B and D.







The Attempt at a Solution


Due to the number of unknowns I split the beam in C and looked at the two halves independently.

I've attached my calculations as a file to this post. I'd appreciate it if someone could take a look.
 

Attachments

  • beam.jpg
    beam.jpg
    18.8 KB · Views: 447
Physics news on Phys.org
Your approach is very good but you are making the same error I pointed out earlier when calculating the distance from the cg of the load to the point A...you have an extra term in there , can you find it?
 
Yes I got a little impatient there. I tried to delete my first post and use this one instead since it was basically the same question, but no go there.

Anyway. Looking at Beam ABC from my drawing. If you are supposed to use the length from cg of the load to A, would this be correct:

q*4,3(the entire length of beam q is working on)*3,35(the length from cg of the load to A)?
 
dreamliner said:
Yes I got a little impatient there. I tried to delete my first post and use this one instead since it was basically the same question, but no go there.

Anyway. Looking at Beam ABC from my drawing. If you are supposed to use the length from cg of the load to A, would this be correct:

q*4,3(the entire length of beam q is working on)*3,35(the length from cg of the load to A)?
Yes, that is correct. The resultant of the distributed load, q*4,3, acts at the cg of the distributed load, 2,15 m from C, which is thus located 3,35 m from A.
 
Thank you.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top