Find Min Distance b/w Origin & Surface z^2= [8-y^2-x^4*y^2]/2

schattenjaeger
Messages
176
Reaction score
0
find the minimum distance between the origin and the surface z^2=[8-y^2-x^4*y^2]/2

so d=sqrt(x^2+y^2+z^2)^(1/2) where for z^2 I sub in that expression in x and y?

so then I take the partials of d wrt to x and y and set those equal to 0, then I solved that system of equations and got x=+-1 and y=+-1 but I'm not sure about that. I also got x=0 and y=0 but I guess that's the max distance since it's the initial point? I dunno. I got the ultimate distance being sqrt(5) by plugging 1 back into the expression for d, you're welcome to practice on it too but I just need to know if the procedure was right
 
Physics news on Phys.org
schattenjaeger said:
find the minimum distance between the origin and the surface z^2=[8-y^2-x^4*y^2]/2

so d=sqrt(x^2+y^2+z^2)^(1/2) where for z^2 I sub in that expression in x and y?

so then I take the partials of d wrt to x and y and set those equal to 0, then I solved that system of equations and got x=+-1 and y=+-1 but I'm not sure about that. I also got x=0 and y=0 but I guess that's the max distance since it's the initial point? I dunno. I got the ultimate distance being sqrt(5) by plugging 1 back into the expression for d, you're welcome to practice on it too but I just need to know if the procedure was right

Proceedure is correct, but it can be simplified since the point at which the minimum distance occurs is also where the square ofthe distance is minimized (so you can drop the square root on d and get the same location). Another method is to use the method of Lagrange multipliers: I'll use it to check your work.

We want to minimize d^2=x^2+y^2+z^2 subject to the constraint 2z^2+y^2+x^4y^2=8. According to the method of Lagrange multipliers we should solve this system of equations:

\left< 2x,2y,2z\right> = \lambda\left< 4x^3y^2,2y+2x^4y,4z \right> and 2z^2+y^2+x^4y^2=8

this simplifies to

x=2\lambda x^3y^2<br /> y=\lambda y(1+x^4)<br /> z=2\lambda z<br /> 2z^2+y^2(1+x^4)=8<br /> <br /> according to the third equation, either z=0 or \lambda =\frac{1}{2}. Assume presently that z=0, then the fourth equations becomes y^2(1+x^4)=8 so that multipling the second equation by y gives y^2=\lambda y^2(1+x^4) = 8\lambdaand putting this into the first equation gives x=16\lambda ^2 x^3<br /> <br /> finish later perhaps... (seems like the other method would be easier).
 
Last edited:
yah I noticed that, when you work it out you get

Fx=1/2(original expression to the -1/2)(another expression)=0

Fy=1/2(original to the -1/2)(another)=0

so you can just chuck the original expressions and solve the two "others" for x and y, which is where you end up if you start from d^2

I couldn't quite convince myself that the minimum of the distance would be the mininum of the d^2 function, I might just be thinking too hard
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top