Find Normal and Tangential components of accelaration

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on finding the normal and tangential components of acceleration for a particle described by the polar equation of motion. Participants express confusion over deriving the necessary components and equations, particularly regarding the relationships between the tangent vector, normal vector, and curvature. Key equations discussed include the definitions of the tangent vector and normal vector, as well as the curvature formula. The conversation highlights the importance of correctly applying derivatives and understanding the distinction between vector and scalar forms. Ultimately, clarity is achieved on the relationships between the vectors and their magnitudes, leading to a better understanding of the problem.
RyanH42
Messages
398
Reaction score
16

Homework Statement


The Particle moves in the plane in a such a way that its polar equation of motion is ## \vec{R}=t\vec{i}+(t^2+1)\vec{j}##.
a)What are its normal and tangential components of accelaration any time t ?
b)Whats the curvature of path any time t ?

Homework Equations


##\vec{a}=d^2s/dt^2\vec{T}+k\vec{N}d^2s/dt^2##
##k=dθ/ds##

The Attempt at a Solution


I couldn't find ##ds/dt## I tried but I stucked.
I have no idea to find k but I couldn't find s
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
One note to avoid confusion. The \frac{ds}{dt} you wrote is the magnitude of the velocity, whereas the \frac{d\vec{R}}{dt} is its vector.

Where did you get that equation for k?
 
ChrisVer said:
One note to avoid confusion. The dsdt\frac{ds}{dt} you wrote is the magnitude of the velocity, whereas the dR⃗ dt\frac{d\vec{R}}{dt} is its vector.
Yeah I remember equations false I checked again it was ##d\vec{R}/ds##
ChrisVer said:
Where did you get that equation for kk?
I remembered that false too it will be ##k=dθ/ds##
 
And Is this equation true every time ? ##d\vec{T}/dθ=\vec{N}## (N is not unit vector).I now its a stupid qustion but the derivation of it come to me not generally true
 
Last edited:
Let me put it else... what does \theta stand for?
 
Last edited:

you can look the graph
 
I got the idea in 21:49 look the magnitude of ##d\vec{T}/ds=dθ/ds=k## Is that mean the magnitude of ##\vec{N}## equal ##k##.I am confused one time he says ##d\vec{T}/dθ=\vec{N}##(In 10:49) now he says ##d\vec{T}/ds=\vec{N}## Is it a special case which I mentioned ?
 
RyanH42 said:
Is that mean the magnitude of
RyanH42 said:
N→\vec{N} equal k

The magnitude of \vec{N} is unity (it's a unit vector). k= \Big| \frac{d\vec{T}}{ds} \Big| is some number and so:
\vec{N} = \frac{d \vec{T}}{ds} \Big/ \Big| \frac{d\vec{T}}{ds} \Big| has magnitude equal to 1.
 
  • Like
Likes RyanH42
First of all, did you find the tangent and normal vector to the acceleration?(question a)
 
  • #10
RyanH42 said:
I am confused one time he says dT→/=N→d\vec{T}/dθ=\vec{N}(In 10:49) now he says dT→/ds=N→d\vec{T}/ds=\vec{N} Is it a special case which I mentioned ?

It is just because the normal vector is:

\vec{N} \equiv \frac{d\vec{T}}{dt} \Big/ \Big|\frac{d \vec{T}}{dt} \Big|
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes RyanH42
  • #11
Tangent vector is \vec{T} = \frac{d \vec{R}}{dt} \Big/ \Big| \frac{d\vec{R}}{dt} \Big| so Its ##\vec{T}=1/√5\vec{i}+2/√5t\vec{j}##.Normal vector will be then ##\vec{N}=\vec{j}##
 
Last edited:
  • #12
ChrisVer said:
It is just because the normal vector is:

\vec{N} \equiv \frac{d\vec{T}}{dt} \Big/ \Big|\frac{d \vec{T}}{dt} \Big|
beg me but I didnt understand first ds (in your #8 post) now we can use dt. Whatever we want we can use that equation I guess.

In previous post I did something wrong cause dot product of T and N must be zero and here its not
 
Last edited:
  • #13
Your T looks wrong. What's dR/dt ? and what's |dR/dt| ?
 
  • #14
RyanH42 said:
beg me but I didnt understand first ds (in your #8 post) now we can use dt. Whatever we want we can use that equation I guess

I am using the parameter of your curve.
 
  • #15
dR/dt=i+4j If I divide the length which its √17 I find dT/dt=i/√17+2/√17j I made a huge mistake I must be an idiot soort
 
  • #16
Either you use the parameter t/\lambda,\theta or whatever you call it, or the arc-length s it doesn't matter...
\frac{d \vec{T}}{ds} will point to the same direction as \frac{d \vec{T}}{dt}. That can be seen by rewritting:
\frac{d \vec{T}}{ds} = \frac{d \vec{T}}{dt} \Big/ \frac{ds}{dt} so you are only getting a multiplicative factor of (ds/dt)^{-1} between the vector \frac{d \vec{T}}{ds} and \frac{d \vec{T}}{dt}. You don't care about that factor as long as you normalize them.
 
  • Like
Likes RyanH42
  • #17
RyanH42 said:
dR/dt=i+2j
this is wrong, what's the derivative \frac{d}{dt} (t^2+1)?
 
  • #18
I made a huge mistake I must be an idiot so so soory
 
  • #19
RyanH42 said:
I made a huge mistake I must be an idiot so so soory

so?
 
  • #20
dR/dt=i+4j If I divide the length which its √17 I find dT/dt=i/√17+2/√17j
 
  • #21
Still you are taking the derivative wrong... \frac{d}{dt} (t^2+1) \ne 4
 
  • #22
4t
 
  • #23
RyanH42 said:
4t
close but no...
 
  • #24
what ??
 
  • #25
2t
 
  • #26
how can I so dump ı have no idea.Actually I wite there 2j but it will be 2tj I missed the t and then I didnt read so I confused
 
  • #27
Try practicing some derivatives...
 
  • #28
No.I know derivatives really believe me.Just I am looking computer like 3 hours maybe 4 and my mind is melt
 
  • #29
I will going to delete these one word posts.I can't do that
 
  • #30
You don't have to help me If you have other works . I will check this question again .Thank you so much.Its your desicion to help me now
 
  • #31
I found the answer The question is not about ##\vec{T}## or ##\vec{N}##.We are in wrong way the equation is ##\vec{a}=d^2s/dt^2(\vec{T}+k\vec{N})## here the components is ##d^2s/dt^2## for ##\vec{T}## and ##d^2s/dt^2k## for ##\vec{N}##.

##ds/dt=√(1+(dy/dx)^2)##
##y=(t^2+1)\vec{j}## → ##dy =2t\vec{j}##,
##x=t\vec{i}## →##dx=t\vec{j}##
##ds/dt=√(1+(2t/1)^2)##
##d^2s/dt^2=8t/2√(1+4t^2)=4t/√(1+4t^2)##
Which I checked I found the right answer.I will do the same thing for ##\vec{N}## but there's k. k=magnitude of ##d\vec{T}/ds##. ##d\vec{T}/ds=d\vec{T}/dt/(ds/dt)## ##d\vec{T}/dt=2j## and ##ds/dt=√(1+(2t/1)^2)## so ##d\vec{T}/ds=2j/√(1+(4t^2)## and the magnitude is ##2/√(1+(4t^2)## but the answer is 2/(1+(4t^2)3/2
What I am missing ?
 
Last edited:
  • #32
I guess I mixed everything :frown::frown::frown::frown::frown::frown::frown::nb):nb):nb)
 
  • #33
Well I found some mistakes...
First of all avoid writting x,y as vectors when they are not...
It would be correct to write x=t \Rightarrow dx = dt and y=t^2+1 \Rightarrow dy= 2 t dt

Also the reason you don't get the right answer is because in \frac{d \vec{T}}{ds} you didn't take the derivatives of the unit-tangent vector, just a tangent vector...you used \vec{T} = \hat{i} + 2t \hat{j} \Rightarrow |\vec{T}|= \sqrt{1+4t^2} \ne 1...
If you do the derivative with the unit-tangent vector correctly (I did it) you will get the result you ask for.
 
  • Like
Likes RyanH42
  • #34
ChrisVer said:
Well I found some mistakes...
First of all avoid writting x,yx,y as vectors when they are not...
It would be correct to write x=t⇒dx=dtx=t \Rightarrow dx = dt and y=t2+1⇒dy=2tdty=t^2+1 \Rightarrow dy= 2 t dt
Ok,thanks for this

"Also the reason you don't get the right answer is because in \frac{d \vec{T}}{ds} you didn't take the derivatives of the unit-tangent vector, just a tangent vector...you used \vec{T} = \hat{i} + 2t \hat{j} \Rightarrow |\vec{T}|= \sqrt{1+4t^2} \ne 1...
If you do the derivative with the unit-tangent vector correctly (I did it) you will get the result you ask for."
Ok.As you said I did it and I understand.I want to ask one question what's the realtionship between ##\vec{T}## and ##k##and ##\vec{N}##.I thought or see ##d\vec{T}/dt=k\vec{N}## ?
 
  • #35
\frac{d \vec{T}}{ds} = k \vec{N}
 
  • Like
Likes RyanH42
  • #36
I understand it thanks the magnitude will give us k but in the vector form this.This vector calculus is really hard.Thanks again for help.
 
Back
Top