Find strength and direction of electric field

AI Thread Summary
To find the electric field strength and direction at the point (2.5, 7) m due to two charges, -4.05 mC at (3, 0) m and +3.85 mC at (10, 0) m, the calculations yield field strengths of 7.40 x 10^5 N/C and 3.28 x 10^5 N/C, respectively. The distances used in the calculations were derived from the coordinates of the charges and the point of interest. The direction of the electric field from the negative charge is towards it, while the field from the positive charge points away. To find the resultant electric field, the angles of the fields relative to the horizontal must be calculated, followed by determining the horizontal and vertical components. The final step involves combining these components to obtain the resultant electric field vector.
sheepcountme
Messages
80
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


There is a charge of -4.05mC at (3,0)m and a charge of +3.85mC at (10,0)m. And I have to find the strength and direction of the field at (2.5,7)m. (Direction to be in degrees).


Homework Equations



E=(kq)/r^2

The Attempt at a Solution



I've found the fields to be 7.40x10^5 N/C for the first and 3.28x10^5 N/C for the second on the point.

And I'm stuck from here. I've started figuring out all sorts of angles but I just get swamped. Could someone please nudge me in the right direction?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you show your calculations of the fields?
 
Sure thing, for the first:
(9x109)(4.05x10-3 / 49.25

The 49.25 came from the distance (2.5-3)2+(7-0)2 (the sqrt of this and then squaring again would cancel each other so I didn't bother with it)

So, that ended up being (3.645x107)/49.25 equaling 740,102=7.40x105

For the second:
(9x109)(3.85x10-3)/105.25

The 105.25 coming from (2.5-10)2+(7-0)2) again ignoring the sqrt squared and getting 56.25+49=105.25

And so, (3.465x107)/105.25 = 328,361 = 3.28x105
 
OK. Now the electric field E1 due to the first charge is towards the charge and the field E2 due to the second charge is away from the charge. To find the resultant we must know the angels made by these fields with horizontal.
For the Ε1, tanθ1 = 7/0.5 and for E2, tanθ2 = 7/7.5. Find θ1 and θ2.

Now take the horizontal and vertical components of E1 and E2 and find the resultant E.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top