Find Telescope Diameter to Resolve Two Stars

  • Thread starter Thread starter dimensionless
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Images
dimensionless
Messages
460
Reaction score
1
I have two stars that are separated by an angle of 3x10^5 radians. They are both emitting monochromatic light on 600nm. I would like to find the diameter of the smallest telescope that can resolve the two stars.

For the angular limit of resolution I have
<br /> \Delta \theta = \frac{1.22 \lambda}{D}<br />

Where D is the diameter of the lens.

Rearranging I get
<br /> D = \frac{1.22 \lambda}{\Delta\theta}=\frac{1.22*600*10^{-9}}{3*10^{-5}} = 2.44 cm<br />

I'm quite sure that the answer is 2.5 cm. Where am I going wrong? Where does the 1.22 come from?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
dimensionless said:
I'm quite sure that the answer is 2.5 cm. Where am I going wrong?
I don't think you're going wrong at all.
Where does the 1.22 come from?
The resolution limit you are using is called Rayleigh's criteria. The 1.22 comes from calculating the diameter of the first dark ring of the Fraunhofer diffraction pattern due to a circular aperature (which involves finding the zeros of a Bessel function--look it up if you want more).
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top