Find the area and length of a gold leaf

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the area of a gold leaf and the length of a cylindrical fiber made from gold. For part A, the area of the leaf is determined to be approximately 0.9288 m² based on the mass and thickness of the gold. In part B, the initial calculation for the length of the fiber resulted in an incorrect value of 30,022,100 cm, which was later corrected to 300,221 m. The calculations utilize the density of gold and the formulas for volume, area, and length. The final values for both parts are confirmed to be correct after adjustments.
MachineInTheStone
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Gold, which has a density of 19.32 g/cm3, is the most ductile metal and can be pressed into a thin leaf or drawn out into a long fiber. (a) If a sample of gold with a mass of 3.872 g, is pressed into a leaf of 5.372 μm thickness, what is the area of the leaf? (b) If, instead, the gold is drawn out into a cylindrical fiber of radius 2.300 μm, what is the length of the fiber?

Homework Equations


d = m/v
v = pi * r^2 * L
v = l*w*h

The Attempt at a Solution


d = m/v[/B]
[Part A]
1) 19.32 g / 1 cm^3 = 3.872g / v
v = 4.98967 cm^3

2) 5.372 micrometer * 1 cm / 10,000 micrometer
= 0.0005372 cm

3) 4.98967 cm^3 / 0.0005372 cm
= 9288 cm^2

4) 9288 cm^2 * 1 m^2 / 10,000 cm^2
= 0.9288 m^2

[part B]
1) 2.300 μm * 1 cm / 10,000 μm
= 0.00023 cm

2) v = pi * r^2 * L
Since v = 4.98967 cm^3 ...
4.98967 cm^3 = pi * (0.00023 cm)^2 * L
4.98967 cm^3 = 0.0000001662 cm^2 * L
L = 30022100 cm

3) 30022100 cm * 1 m / 0.01 cm
= 3,002,210,000 m

Are part A and B correct?
B seems totally wrong!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
MachineInTheStone said:
L = 30022100 cm

3) 30022100 cm * 1 m / 0.01 cm
= 3,002,210,000 m
How come the number is bigger in m than in cm!?
 
  • Like
Likes BvU
ah.
L = 30022100 cm

3) 30,022,100 cm * 1 m / 100 cm
= 300,221 m

Is part A and B correct now?
 
MachineInTheStone said:
1) 19.32 g / 1 cm^3 = 3.872g / v
v = 4.98967 cm^3
No. 1/v = 4.98967 cm-3
 
  • Like
Likes MachineInTheStone
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top