Find the minimum kinetic energy of two electrons in a 1D box

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the minimum kinetic energy of two electrons in a one-dimensional box influenced by their potential energy due to electrostatic interactions. The potential energy was correctly identified as (-7/3)(ke²/d), while the minimum kinetic energy was initially miscalculated as π²ħ²/18md² instead of the correct value of ħ²/36md². The confusion arose from the treatment of the two electrons, suggesting a need to account for their combined mass in the kinetic energy equation. For determining the optimal distance d for minimum total energy, participants noted the importance of combining potential and kinetic energies and differentiating the resulting expression. The thread emphasizes the complexity of quantum mechanics problems involving multiple particles and their interactions.
danmel413
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Problem: Consider a "crystal" consisting of two nuclei and two electrons arranged like this:
q1 q2 q1 q2
with a distance d betweem each. (q1=e, q2=-e)
a) Find the potential energy as a function of d.
b) Assuming the electrons to be restricted to a one-dimensional box of length 3d, find the minimum kinetic energy of the two electrons.
c) Find the value of d for which the total energy is a minimum.

Homework Equations


En=n2pi2hbar2/2mL2

And the Schrodinger equation

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
The Potential energy I found to be (-7/3)(ke2/d) which is correct. (k=coulomb constant).

I assumed the minimum Kinetic energy would be the lowest allowed energy (basically E and n=1) because Potential energy should be zero inside the box. I got as a result pi2hbar2/18md2, but the correct answer is hbar2/36md2.

I have a factor of pi2 that I don't know how to get rid of
I'm missing a factor of 1/2 - is that because there are two electrons and it is thus 2m instead of m?

For c, d is supposed to equal hbar2/42mke2 and I assume it comes from the fact that Eelectric=kq2/r, but I'm not sure how to continue there. I'm guessing it has something to do with the kinetic energy I can't find.

hbar is the reduced Planck constant (h/2pi)

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
danmel413 said:
I assumed the minimum Kinetic energy would be the lowest allowed energy (basically E and n=1) because Potential energy should be zero inside the box. I got as a result pi2hbar2/18md2, but the correct answer is hbar2/36md2.
Perhaps they are expressing their answer in terms of h rather than hbar. Also, don't forget you have two electrons in the box.
 
For part c, you should add the total potential energy you found in (a) to the minimum kinetic energy of the two electrons (answer to b), then differentiate the sum and solve for zero. When I solved, I got an answer of d= h^2 / (42ke^2m)
 
ondryice said:
For part c, you should add the total potential energy you found in (a) to the minimum kinetic energy of the two electrons (answer to b), then differentiate the sum and solve for zero. When I solved, I got an answer of d= h^2 / (42ke^2m)
You're 8 months too late!
 
PeroK said:
You're 8 months too late!
Yeah I figured if someone googles the problem (like I did) then they'll find the whole problem
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top