Find Thevenin Voltage & Current Across R2: Tricks & Tips Included

  • Thread starter Thread starter phyznut
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Thevenin Voltage
AI Thread Summary
To find the Thevenin voltage (Vth) and current across R2, the circuit can be simplified by removing R2, transforming it into a series configuration. The Thevenin resistance (Rth) has been calculated as approximately 2.9 ohms, using the formula (R1 + R4)||(R3 + R5). With R2 removed, the current through R1 is the same as that through R3 and R5, allowing the use of the voltage divider formula to find Vab. The voltage across points A and B is the combined voltage drop across R3 and R5. Understanding this series configuration is crucial for accurately determining Vth.
phyznut
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to find the current and voltage across R2 using thenenin.
http://img209.imageshack.us/img209/4606/thv15ph.png
I've managed to find Rth, which is equal to (R1 + R4)||(R3 + R5). That comes out to about 2.9 ohms. I need help with finding the Vth (Vab) though.
http://img208.imageshack.us/img208/5002/thv28nc.png
Can someone please help me. What are the tricks involved here?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Your second picture IS the trick ... with I_2 = 0, what is V_ab ?
That is, with I_2 = 0 , all the current thru R_1 goes thru R_3 , R_4 , and R_5 .
 
lightgrav said:
Your second picture IS the trick ... with I_2 = 0, what is V_ab ?
That is, with I_2 = 0 , all the current thru R_1 goes thru R_3 , R_4 , and R_5 .

Ok then so with R2 removed, the circuit is now series. That makes the current the same for the remaining resistors.

So if I_2 is 0, then the voltage between that point is also zero? That doesn't seem right though. I still don't get it, please give me another hint.
 
Can no one help.

Would I have to use the voltage divider? How do i use it?
 
Last edited:
Yes you could use the voltage divider formula. With R2 removed, you can think of V_{AB} as the voltage drops across R_3 and R_5

Look at it in this way. When you remove R_2, the circuit now becomes a series circuit. Look at where point A and B are. If you where to take a voltmeter and put the probes across points A and B. Your voltmeter would be giving you to combined voltage of R3 and R5.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top