Finding an electric field at a point from a line of charge

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the electric field at a point 6 cm from the central axis of a thin insulating rod with a charge density of +5 nC/m, placed inside a conducting cylindrical shell. Using Gauss's law, the initial calculation yielded an electric field of 2998 N/C, but the expected answer was 1499 N/C. The discrepancy arises from the need to account for the behavior of electric fields near conducting surfaces, where the field inside a conductor is zero, thus halving the calculated value. Additionally, the correct application of Gauss's law involves recognizing the difference in electric field equations for non-conducting and conducting sheets. Understanding these principles is crucial for accurately determining the electric field in this scenario.
Physiqs
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A thin insulating rod with charge density lambda=+5nC/m is arranged inside a thin conducting cylindrical shell of radius r =3 cm. The rod and the shell are on the same axis, and infinite in length.
What is electric field at point p? 6cm from the central axis.

exam7.jpg


Homework Equations


Gauss's law : E*dA = Qenc/epsilon

The Attempt at a Solution


The question before this was actually to find the sigma.. which was 26.526nC/m^2. So I used sigma in the gauss's law. E*dA( area of cylindrical wall) = (sigma*A)/epsilon and got 2998. However, the answer was exactly the half of that(1499) ... Why?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Just revise the content on field near a non conducting sheet and a conducting sheet. A factor of 2 comes there as there is no field on one side of a conducting sheet as field inside conductor has to be zero. Also i think the answer should be same that you would get in the absence of the infinite cylindrical shell.
 
Physiqs said:

Homework Statement



A thin insulating rod with charge density lambda=+5nC/m is arranged inside a thin conducting cylindrical shell of radius r =3 cm. The rod and the shell are on the same axis, and infinite in length.
What is electric field at point p? 6cm from the central axis.

exam7.jpg


Homework Equations


Gauss's law : E*dA = Qenc/epsilon

The Attempt at a Solution


The question before this was actually to find the sigma.. which was 26.526nC/m^2. So I used sigma in the gauss's law. E*dA( area of cylindrical wall) = (sigma*A)/epsilon and got 2998. However, the answer was exactly the half of that(1499) ... Why?

i think you are making an error in calculation...
the line of charge has given charge per unit length. and the Gaussian cylindrical surface (hypothetical) to calculate the flux through it is to be constructed at 6 cm radius so take the area of this surface times the electrical intensity and apply Gauss theorem.
 
very close to a non-conducting sheet of charge E = σ/ε₀ and for a conducting sheet of charge E' = σ/(2ε₀)
 
Last post was not correct. It may be read as:

very close to a non-conducting sheet of charge E = σ/(2ε₀) and for a conducting sheet of charge E' = σ/ε₀
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top