Finding Current Flux Through Closed Surface

  • Thread starter Thread starter Gee Wiz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Current Flux
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the total current flux J*Ds through a closed surface enclosing a cubic volume defined by vertices at (0,0,0) and (1,1,1) m, given the current density J=xy^2(\hat{x}+\hat{y}+\hat{z}) A/m^2. Participants emphasize using symmetry to simplify the problem, suggesting that the flux can be calculated as the sum of six surface integrals. The current density's direction and magnitude are constant, with variations only in magnitude across different surfaces. Some surfaces yield a current density of zero, which simplifies the calculations further. The conversation highlights the importance of setting up the integral correctly and leveraging symmetry for an efficient solution.
Gee Wiz
Messages
137
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Let J=xy^2(\hat{x}+\hat{y}+\hat{z}) A/m^2 denote the electrical current density filed -i.e, current flux per unit area - in a region of space represented in Cartesian coordinates. A current density of J=xy^2(\hat{x}+\hat{y}+\hat{z}) A/m^2 implies the flow of electrical current in the direction J/abs(J)= (\hat{x}+\hat{y}+\hat{z})/\sqrt{3} with a magnitude of abs(J) = xy^2\sqrt{3} Amperes (A) per unit area.

Calculate the total current flux J*Ds through a closed surface S enclosing a cubic volume V = 1m^3 with vertices at (x,y,z,) = (0,0,0) and (1,1,1) m.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I believe that I can use a fair amount of symmetry for this problem because this flux should be the sum of six surface integrals. I have done a fair amount of things with electric flux in the past..and I feel that this should be very similar however my mind seems to believe drawing a blank is the best solution. I tried to start with the integral of abs(J)*(\hat{z})dxdy=total current enclosed/eo. Is that kind of the right idea? Or should I be trying to set it up differently.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Postpone the symmetry idea and start with one of the six surface integrals. Direction of J is a constant (unit vector) and so is ##d\vec S##. Only thing that varies is the magnitude. Write out the integral.
 
∫xy^2(\hat{z})dxdy

I kind of had this before. I then was thinking along the lines well okay for when I did electric flux if I had a electric field E and I needed to find the charge enclosed and I was given a charge density I would start:

E*2*π*r^2=ρ*π*r^2/εo
then things would cancel and I would get E=ρ/(2*εo)

However, I am unsure how to progress to that point for the current flux. I'm sure its some simple thing I'm not putting together
 
OK, you picked the one where symmetry does come in useful: z=0. Check with the opposite one (z=1) and bingo, two down, four to go.

Note that two of those four have magnitude of J = 0 ( the ones with x or y equal to zero ).

Leaves some work to do, still, but you'll manage !
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top