Finding displacement+distance from a v-t graph

  • Thread starter Thread starter 5.98e24
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Graph
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion clarifies the distinction between displacement and distance in the context of a velocity-time (v-t) graph. The area under the v-t graph represents displacement, while total distance requires summing the absolute values of changes in position. For example, moving in multiple directions results in a greater distance than displacement. To find distance without integration, one can analyze critical points on the graph and estimate distances based on the graph's shape.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of velocity-time graphs
  • Knowledge of displacement vs. distance concepts
  • Familiarity with critical points in calculus
  • Basic graph interpretation skills
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of area under a curve in calculus
  • Learn how to calculate total distance from a v-t graph
  • Explore methods for estimating graph values without equations
  • Review examples of velocity-time graphs with varying motion
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, educators teaching kinematics, and anyone interested in understanding the relationship between velocity, displacement, and distance.

5.98e24
Messages
30
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


This is just a general question. When you have a velocity-time graph, I know that the area under the graph is the displacement. How about the distance? It's not the same as the displacement value, is it?


Homework Equations


n/a


The Attempt at a Solution


I'm stumped. I don't even know if it's possible to find distance, since velocity is a vector and distance is a scalar value.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You should be able to integrate to form a distance/time graph. Distance is not the displacement. If I walk 10 feet to the right, 5 feet to the left, 5 feet to the right, and 5 feet to the left, my displacement is only 5 feet to the right. The total distance I traveled is however 25 feet. If you calculate the changes in distance for each interval of increasing/decreasing, and add up the absolute value of those, you should get the total distance. It helps that the function you have is v/t, in that, you can simply solve it equal to zero and find the critical points and use them on the distance/time graph to figure out the distance.
 
I see. Is there a way to do it without integration, though?
 
The reason why I'm asking about not using integration is because I wasn't given the equation of the graph.
 
Without the actual equation, you'll have to estimate as best you can using the graph.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
658
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K