Finding Electric Field at Point x Away from Origin

AI Thread Summary
To find the electric field at a point p distance x from the origin, the equation E = kq/r^2 is used, where r is the distance calculated using the Pythagorean theorem. The y component of the electric field cancels out due to symmetry, simplifying the calculation to the x component. The correct expression for r is √(x^2 + a^2), which is essential for accurate calculations. Trigonometric functions are applied to find the horizontal component of the electric field. Understanding these concepts and correcting any dimensional errors is crucial for accurate results.
musicfairy
Messages
101
Reaction score
0
Efield.jpg


How do I find the electric field at a point p distance x away from the origin?

I guess the y component cancels. I should use the equation E = kq/r2 and add the electric field made by the 3 charges as vectors, but how do I do that?

My attempt:

r = x/√(x2 + a2)

cosθ = x/r

Ex = 2kqx/√(x2 + a2)3/2 − kq/x2

Is this correct? I don't really understand the concepts well so if someone can explain that to me it'll be nice.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
r = x/√(x2 + a2) can't be right - the dimensions aren't right; right side has distance over distance. Just use the Pythagorean theorem to find the distance.

Find the horizontal part of E = kq/r^2 using trigonometry.
 
Oops, I made a typo on that. I meant to say that r = = √(x2 + a2)
 
Good show. Put in the trigonometry and you will be nearly finished.
Clever of you to notice that symmetry means you don't have to do the vertical part of the calculation.
 

Thread 'Errors and significant figures'

I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
View full post »
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
View full post »

Similar threads

Find the Electric field at point p
Replies
2
Views
2K
Find the electric field at a point away from two charged rods
Replies
11
Views
4K
How Is the Electric Field Calculated for a Point Outside a Charged Ring?
Replies
11
Views
3K
Find the magnitude of the electric field at point P
Replies
5
Views
2K
What is the magnitude of the field at point R?
Replies
5
Views
2K
Why Is Work Positive When Done Against the Electric Field?
Replies
22
Views
3K
Dependence of an electric field on distance
Replies
12
Views
2K
Electric field on the axis of a ring-shaped charged conductor
Replies
1
Views
903
Why are the electrostatic field lines normal to a charged conductor?
Replies
10
Views
1K
Electric field created by point charges
Replies
6
Views
765

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top