Finding electric field intensity

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the electric field intensity at a specific point due to three point charges placed in a vacuum. The charges involved are q1, q2, and q3 with given values, and participants are exploring how to find the resultant electric field intensity at point B.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss finding the electric field intensity due to individual charges before determining the resultant. There are questions about the correctness of initial calculations and the units of charge. Some participants suggest methods for combining electric field vectors, including whether to subtract or vectorially add them based on their directions.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active with participants questioning the assumptions about charge units and the methods for calculating the resultant electric field. Some guidance has been offered regarding the approach to finding the resultant, but there is no explicit consensus on the method to be used.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted confusion regarding the units of charge, with some participants initially assuming they are in coulombs rather than nanocoulombs. Additionally, the presence of an angle between vectors is being debated, which affects how the resultant electric field should be calculated.

Prathamesh
Messages
20
Reaction score
1
3 point charges q1 q2 & q3 are placed in vacuum as shown.
Find electric field intensity at B,if q1=2C,q2=-4C & q3=-2C
queimg.jpg


Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
First find the electric field intensity at the point due individual charges, then find the resultant.

Note:
Electric field intensity due to a charge q at a distance r in the direction of r is given by
E=(1/4πε0)(q/r3)r
ε0=8.854×10-12 Farads/m
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Prathamesh
I have tried it up to this...
Is it right ?
If yes , what to do next and how?
Plz help
 

Attachments

  • Snapshot.jpg
    Snapshot.jpg
    22.6 KB · Views: 485
phoenix95 said:
First find the electric field intensity at the point due individual charges, then find the resultant.

Note:
Electric field intensity due to a charge q at a distance r in the direction of r is given by
E=(1/4πε0)(q/r3)r
ε0=8.854×10-12 Farads/m
Thank you!
But while finding resultant vector , can I first find resultant of intensity (E') due to q2 & q3 and then simply subtract intensity due to q1 (E1) from E'(though E' is not exactly opposite to E1)?
 
Hey, are you sure the units of charge are in C, not nC or anything?
If it is C, then the Es you calculated are wrong... You have write it in terms powers of ten, otherwise use the correct units. (Keep in mind the electrostatic force due to one coulomb of charge is extremely large:smile:)

Prathamesh said:
But while finding resultant vector , can I first find resultant of intensity (E') due to q2 & q3 and then simply subtract intensity due to q1 (E1) from E'(though E' is not exactly opposite to E1)?
Keeping in mind the directions of Es, that is a correct way to do it...:smile:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Prathamesh
phoenix95 said:
Hey, are you sure the units of charge are in C, not nC or anything?
If it is C, then the Es you calculated are wrong... You have write it in terms powers of ten, otherwise use the correct units. (Keep in mind the electrostatic force due to one coulomb of charge is extremely large:smile:)Keeping in mind the directions of Es, that is a correct way to do it...:smile:

Yeah... sorry , Charges are in nC.

so , finding resultant is like this? In solutions it is given that even there is angle θ(θ≠180) between 2 vectors , simply subtract them...
I didnt understand that...
 

Attachments

  • Snapshot1.jpg
    Snapshot1.jpg
    11 KB · Views: 435
Prathamesh said:
so , finding resultant is like this?
Yes.

Prathamesh said:
In solutions it is given that even there is angle θ(θ≠180) between 2 vectors , simply subtract them...
I didnt understand that...
First see if you get the correct resultant :smile:. I didn't catch the 'angle' thing... If you get correct answer then will you please post what exactly the solution says? I'll try my best to explain...
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Prathamesh
phoenix95 said:
Yes.First see if you get the correct resultant :smile:. I didn't catch the 'angle' thing... If you get correct answer then will you please post what exactly the solution says? I'll try my best to explain...

Solution says after finding E' (which comes 18*√5=40.248N/C) to get final result subtract E1 (9N/C) from it. Thus final result becomes 31.248 N/C.
But I think,to get final result vector sum of E' and E1 should be done which gives final result =√1620+81+2*18√5*9*cosθ=√ 1701+362.232cosθ
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: phoenix95
Prathamesh said:
Solution says after finding E' (which comes 18*√5=40.248N/C) to get final result subtract E1 (9N/C) from it. Thus final result becomes 31.248 N/C.
But I think,to get final result vector sum of E' and E1 should be done which gives final result =√1620+81+2*18√5*9*cosθ=√ 1701+362.232cosθ
Correct. :smile: In order do what the solution says, the vectors E' and E1 have to be exactly opposite. You are right.:smile:
 
  • #10
since cosθ comes -0.94≈-1 , it is approximately same as subtracting E1 from E' ...
Thank you...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
994
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
3K