Finding fmax in Thin Lens Refraction Problem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a lens refraction problem involving a light source, a lens with focal length f, and a screen at a fixed distance L. The goal is to demonstrate that there are two positions for the lens where an image can be formed on the screen, provided f is less than a maximum value, fmax. Participants suggest using the lens formula to derive a quadratic equation for the position of the lens, leading to two solutions for s. The conversation confirms the correct application of the quadratic formula and highlights the relationship between the lens position and image size. The problem remains unsolved in terms of finding fmax, as the lecturer has not provided answers.
icedragon
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Hi all. This is a problem from one of the problem sheets from earlier in the term. I'm just revising for my exam tomorrow and can't solve this one. Here it is:

Consider a light source placed at a fixed distance L from a screen, such that a lens of focal length
f can be placed between the source and the screen. Show that as long as f < fmax there are two
positions where the lens can be placed so that an image is formed on the screen, and find a value for fmax.

Homework Equations



1/s + 1/s' = 1/f

The Attempt at a Solution



I substituted in s' = L-s which gives me:

1/s + 1/(L-s) = 1/f

Given that there are two solutions and the nature of that formula I am guessing I need a quadratic equation and then to solve for s. Not sure how to expand that equation so I can solve for s?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
multiply both sides by s(L-s) and you will get a quadratic equation.
 
So far so good. f and L are constants, right? Merely solve for s. Yep, you might a quadratic equation with two solutions.
 
Thanks for the help. Got the equation in the form (1/f)s^2 - (L/f)s + L = 0 giving the solutions s= (L±sqrt((L/f)^2 - (4L/f))/2

Does that look good? Lecturer hasn't published answers to this problem sheet for some reason. :(
 
your quadratic equation loo0ks good. I assume you are using the quadratic formula to solve for s. Just make sure you use the quad formula correctly. Note that when the lens is close to the object, the image is large, and when the lens is close to the screen, the image is small.
 
Yep I used the quadratic formula. Thanks for your help. :)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top