Finding Mole Fractions in a Two-Phase Equilibrium System

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on solving a thermodynamics problem involving a two-phase equilibrium system with a fixed volume. The user seeks to determine the initial and final mole fractions of vapor after heating a material at constant volume, which increases its pressure. Key steps include using the Clapeyron equation to find the final temperature and applying the ideal gas law to calculate the number of moles of vapor in the final state. Participants emphasize that the vapor occupies nearly the entire volume, simplifying the calculations. Ultimately, the user realizes the solution is straightforward after clarifying the relationship between temperature, pressure, and volume.
FranciscoSili
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Homework type problem posted in wrong forum, so no template
Hello everyone, I'm doing revision for a final exam in Thermodynamics and i found this exercise i can't solve:

A particular material has a latent heat of vaporization Δh, constant along the coexistence curve. One mole of this material exists in two.phase (liquid-vapor) equilibrium in a container of fixed volume V0, at an initial temperature T0 and a pressure P0. The system is heated at constant volume increasing its pressure to 2P0. The vapor phase can be treated as an monoatomic ideal gas, and the molar volume of the liquid can be neglected relativa to that of the gas. Find the initial and final mole fractions of the vapor phase. ( x≡Ng/(Ng+Nl) ).

I started using the Clapeyron equation to find the final temperature (Tf) of the gas (and so the complete system i think). I integrated from T0 to Tf in one side and from P0 to Pf in the other. The only unknown variable was Tf. Then using the ideal gas equation ( vg(molar volume of gas)=NRTf ) and dividing that by N = Ng + Nl I could leave the final mole fraction of the gas as a function of Pf, Tf and final vg, which i don't know.

So, how can i find the value of the final molar volume? This problem is in a book called Herbert Callen - "Thermodynamics and an Introduction to Thermostatistics" 2nd Edition. page 233 problem 9·3-7

Thank you and sorry i don't use formulas, i don't know how to write them here.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You're told the volume of the container, that its value is fixed, and that the volume of liquid is negligible. . . .
 
You know the initial temperature, pressure, and volume. So how many moles of vapor do you have? You know the final temperature, pressure, and volume. So how many moles of vapor do you have?
 
John Park said:
You're told the volume of the container, that its value is fixed, and that the volume of liquid is negligible. . . .
Yes i know, but after the process both liquid and gas mole fractions changed. I need to know, that variation, specifically in the gas one.
 
FranciscoSili said:
Yes i know, but after the process both liquid and gas mole fractions changed. I need to know, that variation, specifically in the gas one.
The vapor occupies virtually the entire volume. From the ideal gas law, how many moles of vapor do you have in the final state? You know the temperature, the pressure, and the volume.
 
  • Like
Likes FranciscoSili
Chestermiller said:
The vapor occupies virtually the entire volume. From the ideal gas law, how many moles of vapor do you have in the final state? You know the temperature, the pressure, and the volume.
Oh, yes. Oh my god, it was very simple :) thank you very much! :D
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top