Finding Optimal Thickness for 50 MPa Pressure Vessel

AI Thread Summary
To determine the optimal thickness for a pressure vessel under 50 MPa, the hoop stress equation was initially used, yielding a thickness of 12 mm. However, the correct governing equation is the longitudinal stress equation, which results in a minimum thickness of 6 mm. The discussion highlights that the longitudinal stress is crucial because it affects the welded joint, while hoop stress does not. The misunderstanding stems from the assumption about the weld's contribution to the stress distribution. Ultimately, the governing stress for this scenario is the longitudinal stress due to its impact on the weld integrity.
Precursor
Messages
219
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement

[PLAIN]http://img714.imageshack.us/img714/7747/43416215.jpg

The attempt at a solution

I have already solved parts (a) and (b). It's part (c) that I can't get.

To get a minimum thickness at 50 MPa, I thought that the hoop stress equation would govern. Here is my calculation for it:

\sigma = \frac{Pr}{t}

Solving for t, I get:

t = \frac{Pr}{\sigma}

t = \frac{(1200*10^{3} Pa)(0.5m)}{50*10^{6} MPa}

t = 0.012 m

t = 12 mm


However, this is not the answer. The answer takes the longitudinal stress equation as the governing one. Therefore, the solution is half of mine, a thickness of 6 mm.

Why is this so?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
But you are assuming that the weld is part of the hemisphere. I believe that it is part of both the cylinder and the hemisphere. If it was only part of the hemisphere, the solution wouldn't have stated that the longitudinal stress governed.
 
The cylinder longitudinal force is the tensile force across the weld.
 
But why would the longitudinal stress govern if the hoop stress results in a greater thickness?
 
Precursor: The cylinder hoop stress does not travel across the welded joint, whereas the cylinder longitudinal stress does. The longitudinal stress governs only for the weld size here. By the way, your pictures are too wide. Please see post https://www.physicsforums.com/showpost.php?p=2937012".
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back
Top