Finding rate of relativistic work, special relativity.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the expression for the rate of relativistic work, specifically showing that dE/dt equals m0/(1-u^2)^(3/2) multiplied by u and du/dt. Participants clarify the use of relativistic mass, m(u), and its relationship to rest mass, m0, and velocity, u. There is confusion regarding the treatment of the dot product in the context of velocity and acceleration, with suggestions that it should be treated as a simple multiplication. The problem's statement is noted to be ambiguous, leading to differing interpretations of the variables involved. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly applying the principles of special relativity in the derivation.
T-chef
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Hello all,

Homework Statement


Given \frac{dE}{dt}=\frac{d(m(u))}{dt}\cdot u
show that \frac{dE}{dt}=\frac{m_0}{(1-u^2)^{\frac{3}{2}}}u\frac{du}{dt}
where u is velocity, m(u) is relativistic mass, and m_0 is rest mass.

Homework Equations


m(u)=\frac{m_0}{\sqrt{1-u^2}}

The Attempt at a Solution


Substituting in m(u) gives \frac{dE}{dt} = \frac{d}{dt}(\frac{m_0}{\sqrt{1-u^2}})\cdot u
Using the chain rule
= \frac{d}{du}(\frac{m_0}{\sqrt{1-u^2}})\frac{du}{dt}\cdot u
= \frac{m_0 u}{(1-u^2)^{3/2}}\frac{du}{dt} \cdot u
From here I get into trouble. My first thought was since u should be parallel to \frac{du}{dt} the dot product just becomes multiplication, but then there's an extra u factor. Any help from here would be greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The problem statement is ambiguous. The quantity in parenthesis should be written as mu, and not m(u). More precisely, it should be moγu.
 
I don't think the relativistic mass should be a vector, so that dot must be just an ordinary product between two scalars. I do agree that the problem seems a little strange.
 
That makes much more sense, thanks for the help guys
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top